The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes

被引:526
作者
Feinberg, Matthew [1 ]
Willer, Robb [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Ctr Compass & Altruism Res & Educ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Sociol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
morality; policymaking; personal values; scientific communication; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BEHAVIOR; VALUES; CONSEQUENCES; CONVICTION;
D O I
10.1177/0956797612449177
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Americans' attitudes about the environment are highly polarized, but it is unclear why this is the case. We conducted five studies to examine this issue. Studies 1a and 1b demonstrated that liberals, but not conservatives, view the environment in moral terms and that this tendency partially explains the relation between political ideology and environmental attitudes. Content analyses of newspaper op-eds (Study 2a) and public-service announcements (Study 2b) found that contemporary environmental discourse is based largely on moral concerns related to harm and care, which are more deeply held by liberals than by conservatives. However, we found that reframing proenvironmental rhetoric in terms of purity, a moral value resonating primarily among conservatives, largely eliminated the difference between liberals' and conservatives' environmental attitudes (Study 3). These results establish the importance of moralization as a cause of polarization on environmental attitudes and suggest that reframing environmental discourse in different moral terms can reduce the gap between liberals and conservatives in environmental concern.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 62
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Bazerman MH, 1999, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V21, P39
[2]   We're Closer than I Thought: Social Network Heterogeneity, Morality, and Political Persuasion [J].
Bloom, Pazit Ben-Nun ;
Levitan, Lindsey Clark .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 32 (04) :643-665
[3]  
BOOTE AS, 1981, J ADVERTISING RES, V21, P29
[4]   Misperceptions in intergroup conflict - Disagreeing about what we disagree about [J].
Chambers, JR ;
Baron, RS ;
Inman, ML .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (01) :38-45
[5]   Unintended Consequences of Cooperation Inducing and Maintaining Mechanisms in Public Goods Dilemmas: Sanctions and Moral Appeals [J].
Chen, Xiao-Ping ;
Pillutla, Madan M. ;
Yao, Xin .
GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2009, 12 (02) :241-255
[6]  
Dunlap R.E., 2001, Environmental Politics, V10, P23, DOI [10.1080/714000580, DOI 10.1080/714000580]
[7]  
Emler N., 2002, European Review of Social Psychology, V13, P259, DOI DOI 10.1080/10463280240000082
[8]   Apocalypse Soon? Dire Messages Reduce Belief in Global Warming by Contradicting Just-World Beliefs [J].
Feinberg, Matthew ;
Willer, Robb .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (01) :34-38
[9]   NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PERSUASIVE APPEALS FOR A PROSOCIAL, ALTRUISTIC ACT - BLOOD DONATING [J].
FERRARI, JR ;
LEIPPE, MR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 22 (02) :83-101
[10]   System Justification, the Denial of Global Warming, and the Possibility of "System-Sanctioned Change" [J].
Feygina, Irina ;
Jost, John T. ;
Goldsmith, Rachel E. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2010, 36 (03) :326-338