Evaluation of staff workload during resuscitation of trauma patients

被引:6
作者
Huang, MS [1 ]
Yang, YF
Lee, CH
机构
[1] Vet Gen Hosp, Emergency Dept, Div Surg, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
[2] Vet Gen Hosp, Emergency Dept, Div Surg, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE | 2002年 / 52卷 / 03期
关键词
workload; workload scoring system; Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS);
D O I
10.1097/00005373-200203000-00013
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Evaluating the medical staff workload during resuscitation of trauma patients is one of the important quality assurance activities to provide adequate medical manpower, especially for patients with life-threatening or severe injuries. Nevertheless, there is no method available to measure and calculate the amount of workload during resuscitation. We sought to develop a new framework of Workload Scoring System (WSS) to evaluate and quantify the medical staff workload during resuscitation. Methods: From July 1996 to July 1998, the records of 11,800 trauma patients were prospectively collected from our computer-stored medical record system. The Workload Scoring System points with reference to age, different triage category on the basis of triage version of the Revised Trauma Score (RTS), level category on the basis of Injury Severity Score (ISS), and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) in six body regions were calculated to survey the medical staff workload. Results: The WSS points were 18.51 +/- 0.80 for triage I, 11.88 +/- 0.17 for triage II, and 6.90 +/- 0.04 for triage III trauma patients. The WSS points were 23.10 +/- 0.67 for Level I, 20.34 +/- 0.25 for Level II, 12.87 +/- 0.08 for Level III, and 6.03 +/- 0.02 for Level IV trauma patients. There were statistically significant differences among triage I, II, and III trauma patients, and among Level I, II, III, and IV trauma patients (p < 0.01). The worse the physiologic status and the greater the anatomic damage, the more medical staff workload was needed. Multiple regression with linear model may predict WSS points as an equation of -8.920 + 1.375 ISS + 1.785 RTS + 0.424 Age (r(2) = 0.621), which accounts for 62.1% of the variance in WSS points. Conclusion: WSS provides a valuable tool to measure and quantify the medical staff workload during resuscitation as a function of -8.920 + 1.375 ISS + 1.785 RTS + 0.424 Age. The greatest benefit of this methodology is to forecast the expected medical staff workload to allocate sufficient medical manpower to provide the desired trauma care.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 497
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ABBR INJ SCAL 1990 R
[2]  
ARMITAGE P, 1989, STAT METHODS MED RES
[3]   EVALUATING TRAUMA CARE - THE TRISS METHOD [J].
BOYD, CR ;
TOLSON, MA ;
COPES, WS .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1987, 27 (04) :370-378
[4]   A REVISION OF THE TRAUMA SCORE [J].
CHAMPION, HR ;
SACCO, WJ ;
COPES, WS ;
GANN, DS ;
GENNARELLI, TA ;
FLANAGAN, ME .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1989, 29 (05) :623-629
[5]   CLINICAL PROSPECTIVE INJURY SEVERITY SCORING - WHEN IS IT ACCURATE [J].
CIVIL, ID ;
SCHWAB, CW .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1989, 29 (05) :613-614
[6]  
CUE F, 1978, HOSPITALS, V52, P110
[7]   THE HOSPITAL TRAUMA TEAM - A MODEL FOR TRAUMA MANAGEMENT [J].
DEANE, SA ;
GAUDRY, PL ;
PEARSON, I ;
MISRA, S ;
MCNEIL, RJ ;
READ, C .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1990, 30 (07) :806-812
[8]  
*DEP HLTH EX YUAN, 1992, DEATH RAT 10 LEAD SI, P10
[9]   QUALITY ASSURANCE IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT [J].
FLINT, LS ;
HAMMETT, WH ;
MARTENS, K .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1985, 14 (02) :134-138
[10]  
GARDEN RS, 1965, LANCET, V24, P901