Price discrimination in input markets

被引:83
作者
Inderst, Roman [1 ]
Valletti, Tommaso [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Frankfurt, D-6000 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London SW7 2AZ, England
[3] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
关键词
WELFARE; TECHNOLOGY; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1756-2171.2008.00053.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We analyze the short- and long-run implications of third-degree price discrimination in input markets. In contrast to the extant literature, which typically assumes that the supplier is an unconstrained monopolist, in our model input prices are constrained by the threat of demand-side substitution. In our model, the more efficient buyer receives a discount. A ban on price discrimination thus benefits smaller but hurts more efficient, larger firms. It also stifles incentives to invest and innovate. With linear demand, a ban on price discrimination benefits consumers in the short run but reduces consumer surplus in the long run, which is once again the opposite of what is found without the threat of demand-side substitution.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:19
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Investment and market dominance [J].
Athey, S ;
Schmutzler, A .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2001, 32 (01) :1-26
[2]   Downstream integration by a bottleneck input supplier whose regulated whole sale prices are above costs [J].
Biglaiser, G ;
DeGraba, P .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2001, 32 (02) :302-315
[3]  
BIGLAISER G, 2005, DYNAMIC PRICE UNPUB
[4]   OPTIMAL TARIFFS AND THE CHOICE OF TECHNOLOGY - DISCRIMINATORY TARIFFS VS THE MOST-FAVORED-NATION CLAUSE [J].
CHOI, JP .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 38 (1-2) :143-160
[6]  
DEGRABA P, 1990, AM ECON REV, V80, P1246
[7]  
DUKES A, 2006, ROBINSONPATMAN UNPUB
[8]   Unionisation structures and innovation incentives [J].
Haucap, J ;
Wey, C .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2004, 114 (494) :C149-C165
[9]  
HERMALIN B, 2006, INFORM HOLD UP UNPUB
[10]   The economics of product-line restrictions with an application to the network neutrality debate [J].
Hermalin, Benjamin E. ;
Katz, Michael L. .
INFORMATION ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2007, 19 (02) :215-248