The Delphi process - an expert-based approach to ecological modelling in data-poor environments

被引:113
作者
MacMillan, DC [1 ]
Marshall, K [1 ]
机构
[1] St Marys Univ, Dept Geog & Environm, Old Aberdeen AB24 3UF, Scotland
关键词
Delphi approach; capercaillie conservation; expert values;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-1795.2005.00001.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Resource managers are involved in difficult decisions that affect rare species and habitats but often lack relevant ecological knowledge and experience. Ecological models are increasingly being looked to as a means of assisting the decision-making process, but very often the data are missing or are unsuited to empirical modelling. This paper describes the development and application of the Delphi approach to develop a decision support tool for wildlife conservation and management. The Delphi process is an expert-based approach to decision support that can be used as a means for predicting outcomes in situations where 'absolute' or 'objective' models are unavailable or compromised by lack of appropriate data. The method aims to develop consensus between experts over several rounds of deliberation on the assumption that combining the expertise of several individuals will provide more reliable results than consulting one or two individuals. In this paper the approach is used to engineer soft knowledge on the conservation requirements of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus, an endangered woodland grouse, into a model that can be used by forests managers to improve the quality of forest habitat for capercaillie over extensive commercial forest areas. This paper concludes with a discussion of the potential advantages and disadvantages of Delphi and other soft knowledge approaches to ecological modelling and conservation management.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 19
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Abundance and distribution of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus in Scotland 1992-1994 [J].
Catt, DC ;
Baines, D ;
Picozzi, N ;
Moss, R ;
Summers, RW .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1998, 85 (03) :257-267
[2]  
CRANCE JH, 1987, 8210134 NAT EC CTR
[3]   A novel Bayesian approach to assessing impacts of rain forest logging [J].
Crome, FHJ ;
Thomas, MR ;
Moore, LA .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1996, 6 (04) :1104-1123
[4]  
Delbecq AL., 1975, Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Techniques
[5]  
*DEP ENV, 1995, BIOD UK STEER GROUP, V2
[6]  
Kangas J., 1993, Silva Fennica, V27, P259
[7]  
Kangas J, 1998, FOREST SCI, V44, P610
[8]   Optimising capercailzie habitat in commercial forestry plantations [J].
MacMillan, DC ;
Marshall, K .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 198 (1-3) :351-365
[9]   Cost-effectiveness analysis of woodland ecosystem restoration [J].
Macmillan, DC ;
Harley, D ;
Morrison, R .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 27 (03) :313-324
[10]   Using Bayesian belief networks to evaluate fish and wildlife population viability under land management alternatives from an environmental impact statement [J].
Marcot, BG ;
Holthausen, RS ;
Raphael, MG ;
Rowland, MM ;
Wisdom, MJ .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2001, 153 (1-3) :29-42