Do hens have friends?

被引:13
作者
Abeyesinghe, Siobhan M. [1 ]
Drewe, Julian A. [1 ]
Asher, Lucy [2 ]
Wathes, Christopher M. [1 ]
Collins, Lisa M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Royal Vet Coll, Dept Prod & Populat Hlth, London NW1 0TU, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Vet Med & Sci, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[3] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Biol Sci, Belfast BT7 1NN, Antrim, North Ireland
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Social preference; Affiliative behaviour; Social network analysis; Domestic fowl; Spatial distribution; GROUP-SIZE; SOCIAL-BEHAVIOR; RED JUNGLEFOWL; GALLUS-GALLUS; LAYING HENS; PATTERNS; ANIMALS; FOWL;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2012.12.003
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Recent interest in positive welfare has encouraged consideration of the formation of socio-positive relationships in farmed species which may provide a means by which to manage positive states. We investigated in detail the existence of dyadic preferential associations in small groups of domestic laying hens. Spatial and temporal associations were examined in two contexts (day activity and evening roosting), within 8 identical pens of 15 laying hens over 8 weeks. Little aggression was observed. Social network analysis was performed to investigate correlations in who associated with whom using weighted degree (number) and binary (presence or absence) data for shared resource areas and proximity to other individuals. No consistent evidence was found for hens actively preferring others in their choice of resource area, or in companion proximity. Perch-roosting positions chosen by the hens were compared with data generated from a random-choice model. Hens showed no position preferences. Most dyads were never observed roosting together and, although some apparently perched together frequently, the low number of nights perching and proportion of nights spent together indicates these findings should be interpreted with caution. Overall, we found no convincing evidence of dyadic preferential relationships expressed by close active and resting proximities. Further work is required to confirm whether these findings hold true in other experimental contexts, are affected by social experience and if they hold in common with the progenitor sub-species. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 66
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Investigating social discrimination of group members by laying hens [J].
Abeyesinghe, Siobhan M. ;
McLeman, Morven A. ;
Owen, Rachael C. ;
McMahon, Claire E. ;
Wathes, Christopher M. .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2009, 81 (01) :1-13
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, UCINET IV: Network Analysis Software
[3]  
Reference Manual
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, ANAL ANIMAL SOC
[5]   A method for testing association patterns of social animals [J].
Bejder, L ;
Fletcher, D ;
Bräger, S .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1998, 56 :719-725
[6]   MAMMALIAN DISPERSAL AND ONTOGENY OF INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIORAL PHENOTYPES [J].
BEKOFF, M .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1977, 111 (980) :715-732
[7]   Mothering during early development influences subsequent emotional and social behaviour in Japanese quail [J].
Bertin, A ;
Richard-Yris, MA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY PART A-ECOLOGICAL AND INTEGRATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 303A (09) :792-801
[8]   Social bonds between unrelated females increase reproductive success in feral horses [J].
Cameron, Elissa Z. ;
Setsaas, Trine H. ;
Linklater, Wayne L. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (33) :13850-13853
[9]   Social organization of a red junglefowl, Gallus gallus, population related to evolution theory [J].
Collias, NE ;
Collias, EC .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1996, 51 :1337-1354
[10]   A FIELD STUDY OF RED JUNGLE FOWL IN NORTH-CENTRAL INDIA [J].
COLLIAS, NE ;
COLLIAS, EC .
CONDOR, 1967, 69 (04) :360-&