Domains and dimensions in acculturation:: Implicit theories of Turkish-Dutch

被引:135
作者
Arends-Tóth, J [1 ]
van de Vijver, FJR [1 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Dept Psychol, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
psychological acculturation; implicit theories; dimensionality models; domain-specific models; Turkish-Dutch;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijintrel.2003.09.001
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present study aims to further our understanding of psychological acculturation by examining which current models of acculturation correspond most with implicit theories of Turkish-Dutch. Current theoretical models of acculturation differ in two aspects: dimensionality (unidimensional adaptation, a bidimensional combination of culture maintenance and adaptation, or a multidimensional fusion of two cultures) and domain specificity (trait or domain-specific models). Domain specificity of acculturation played a more central role in the implicit theories of Turkish-Dutch than typically assumed in current theoretical models. The unidimensional domain-specific model was most frequently employed. Turkish-Dutch emphasized the importance of both Dutch and Turkish culture in their lives (thereby supporting the popular notion of integration), but this importance varied across domains: Adjustment to Dutch culture was more emphasized in the public (functional, utilitarian) domain while maintenance of Turkish culture was more emphasized in the private (social-emotional, value-related) domain. This study documents the need to elaborate on domain specificity and on the meaning of integration in acculturation models. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 35
页数:17
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Multiculturalism and acculturation:: Views of Dutch and Turkish-Dutch [J].
Arends-Tóth, J ;
Van de Vijver, FJR .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 33 (02) :249-266
[2]  
Berry JW, 1997, APPL PSYCHOL-INT REV, V46, P5, DOI 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x
[3]   ACCULTURATION AND ADAPTATION IN A NEW SOCIETY [J].
BERRY, JW .
INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION, 1992, 30 :69-85
[4]   ACCULTURATION ATTITUDES IN PLURAL SOCIETIES [J].
BERRY, JW ;
KIM, U ;
POWER, S ;
YOUNG, M ;
BUJAKI, M .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE, 1989, 38 (02) :185-206
[5]   Towards an Interactive Acculturation Model: A social psychological approach [J].
Bourhis, RY ;
Moise, LC ;
Perreault, S ;
Senecal, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 32 (06) :369-386
[6]  
Clement R., 1992, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, V11, P203, DOI [10.1177/0261927X92114002, DOI 10.1177/0261927X92114002]
[7]   STRATEGIES FOR COPING WITH CULTURAL-DIVERSITY [J].
COLEMAN, HLK .
COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGIST, 1995, 23 (04) :722-740
[8]  
Cuellar I., 1980, HISPANIC J BEHAV SCI, V2, P199, DOI DOI 10.1177/07399863950173001
[9]   An empirical comparison of acculturation models [J].
Flannery, WP ;
Reise, SP ;
Yu, JJ .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2001, 27 (08) :1035-1045
[10]  
Gordon M. M., 1964, Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion and National Origins