The deterministic nature of earthquake rupture

被引:231
作者
Olson, EL
Allen, RM
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Earth & Planetary Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Geol & Geophys, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1038/nature04214
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Understanding the earthquake rupture process is central to our understanding of fault systems and earthquake hazards. Multiple hypotheses concerning the nature of fault rupture have been proposed but no unifying theory has emerged(1-12). The conceptual hypothesis most commonly cited is the cascade model for fault rupture(1,3,10,13). In the cascade model, slip initiates on a small fault patch and continues to rupture further across a fault plane as long as the conditions are favourable. Two fundamental implications of this domino-like theory are that small earthquakes begin in the same manner as large earthquakes and that the rupture process is not deterministic - that is, the size of the earthquake cannot be determined until the cessation of rupture. Here we show that the frequency content of radiated seismic energy within the first few seconds of rupture scales with the final magnitude of the event. We infer that the magnitude of an earthquake can therefore be estimated before the rupture is complete. This finding implies that the rupture process is to some degree deterministic and has implications for the physics of the rupture process.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 215
页数:4
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
ABERCROMBIE R, 1994, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V84, P725
[2]   The potential for earthquake early warning in southern California [J].
Allen, RM ;
Kanamori, H .
SCIENCE, 2003, 300 (5620) :786-789
[3]   Properties of the seismic nucleation phase [J].
Beroza, GC ;
Ellsworth, WL .
TECTONOPHYSICS, 1996, 261 (1-3) :209-227
[4]   IMPLICATIONS OF EARTHQUAKE TRIGGERING AND RUPTURE PROPAGATION FOR EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION BASED ON PREMONITORY PHENOMENA [J].
BRUNE, JN .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1979, 84 (NB5) :2195-2198
[5]   WHY LARGE EARTHQUAKES DO NOT NUCLEATE AT SHALLOW DEPTHS [J].
DAS, S ;
SCHOLZ, CH .
NATURE, 1983, 305 (5935) :621-623
[6]   Detailed observations of California foreshock sequences: Implications for the earthquake initiation process [J].
Dodge, DA ;
Beroza, GC ;
Ellsworth, WL .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1996, 101 (B10) :22371-22392
[7]   The 2002 Denali fault earthquake, Alaska:: A large magnitude, slip-partitioned event [J].
Eberhart-Phillips, D ;
Haeussler, PJ ;
Freymueller, JT ;
Frankel, AD ;
Rubin, CM ;
Craw, P ;
Ratchkovski, NA ;
Anderson, G ;
Carver, GA ;
Crone, AJ ;
Dawson, TE ;
Fletcher, H ;
Hansen, R ;
Harp, EL ;
Harris, RA ;
Hill, DP ;
Hreinsdóttir, S ;
Jibson, RW ;
Jones, LM ;
Kayen, R ;
Keefer, DK ;
Larsen, CF ;
Moran, SC ;
Personius, SF ;
Plafker, G ;
Sherrod, B ;
Sieh, K ;
Sitar, N ;
Wallace, WK .
SCIENCE, 2003, 300 (5622) :1113-1118
[8]   Observation of the seismic nucleation phase in the Ridgecrest, California, earthquake sequence [J].
Ellsworth, WL ;
Beroza, GC .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1998, 25 (03) :401-404
[9]   SEISMIC EVIDENCE FOR AN EARTHQUAKE NUCLEATION PHASE [J].
ELLSWORTH, WL ;
BEROZA, GC .
SCIENCE, 1995, 268 (5212) :851-855
[10]   HIERARCHY IN EARTHQUAKE SIZE DISTRIBUTION [J].
FUKAO, Y ;
FURUMOTO, M .
PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS, 1985, 37 (2-3) :149-168