Shared knowledge and product design glitches in integrated product development

被引:61
作者
Rupak, Rauniar [1 ]
William, Doll [2 ]
Greg, Rawski [3 ]
Paul, Hong
机构
[1] Univ St Thomas, Dept Management & Mkt, Coll Business, Houston, TX 77006 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Dept Management, Coll Business, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[3] Univ Evansville, Dept Management, Coll Business, Evansville, IN 47722 USA
关键词
product glitches; IPD process; shared knowledge; project performance;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.03.005
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Product development processes based on the joint collaboration of the cross-functional team, suppliers, and customers can minimize project glitches. Glitches in the product development project can cause project cost over-runs and delay a project past when first mover advantages are possible. While previous theoretical work has suggested a negative relationship between shared knowledge and product development glitches, empirical studies have not identified how different types of shared knowledge are associated with each other and the design glitches. This study proposes a model of the relationship between specific types of shared knowledge and design glitches in integrated product development (IPD) projects. We test our model using a sample of 191 projects from the automotive industry in the United States. The major findings were that: (1) shared knowledge of the development process can be built by improving 1 team's shared knowledge of customers, suppliers, and internal capabilities, (2) shared knowledge of the development process for a project reduces product design glitches, and (3) reduced product design glitches improve product development time, cost, and customer satisfaction. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 736
页数:14
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]   Review:: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems:: Conceptual foundations and research issues [J].
Alavi, M ;
Leidner, DE .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2001, 25 (01) :107-136
[2]  
ANDERSON E, 1999, QUANTITATIVE MODELS
[3]  
[Anonymous], EUR J INNOV MANAGE
[4]  
[Anonymous], J ACAD MARKETING SCI
[5]  
[Anonymous], EFFECTIVE PRODUCT DE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1999, INT DESIGN ENG TECH
[7]  
ARBUCKLE JL, 2003, AMOS 5 0 AMOS USERS
[8]  
Arlati E., 1995, P 8 INT C SYST RES I
[9]  
Armistead C., 1993, Logist. Inf. Manag, V6, P9, DOI [10.1108/09576059310045907, DOI 10.1108/09576059310045907]
[10]  
Bentler P., 1992, EQS STRUCTURAL EQUAT