Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes

被引:63
作者
Fiorentino, RP
Zepeda, MA
Goldstein, BH
John, CR
Rettenmaier, MA
机构
[1] Hoag Mem Hosp, Ctr Canc, Gynecol Oncol Associates, Newport Beach, CA 92663 USA
[2] St Joseph Hosp, Reg Canc Ctr, Orange, CA USA
[3] Utah Valley State Coll, Dept Behav Sci, Orem, UT USA
关键词
robotic surgery; laparoscopy; hysterectomy;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2005.11.001
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the operative variables and complications associated with robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. DESIGN: Canadian Task Force classification II-1. SETTING: Gynecology service affiliated with a major cancer center in Southern California. PATIENTS: Twenty women with a benign gynecologic condition. INTERVENTION: Robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Patient status was evaluated in terms of operative morbidity, length of surgery, anesthesia time, estimated blood loss, and hospital stay. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean operative time was 3.2 hours, and anesthesia time was 4 hours. Mean estimated blood loss was 81 mL, and patient postoperative hospital stay was 2 days. The complication rate in this study was low. The surgical procedure was converted to a laparotomy and abdominal hysterectomy in two patients because of poor visualization during robotic-assisted surgery. CONCLUSIONS: While the number of patients and nonrandomized nature of this single-institution experience are insufficient to draw any definitive conclusions regarding potential treatment efficacy, the patient postoperative stay and low complication rates suggest that this procedure is feasible and promising. Additional study comparing the efficacy and cost of robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy with standard laparoscopic hysterectomy with a larger patient population is warranted. (C) 2006 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 63
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Beste Todd M, 2005, JSLS, V9, P13
[2]   Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis:: a feasibility study [J].
Degueldre, M ;
Vandromme, J ;
Huong, PT ;
Cadière, GB .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 74 (05) :1020-1023
[3]   Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot [J].
Diaz-Arrastia, C ;
Jurnalov, C ;
Gomez, G ;
Townsend, C .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (09) :1271-1273
[4]  
DiLuigi AJ, 2004, J REPROD MED, V49, P949
[5]   Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse [J].
DiMarco, DS ;
Chow, GK ;
Gettman, MT ;
Elliott, DS .
UROLOGY, 2004, 63 (02) :373-376
[6]   Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a human pilot study [J].
Falcone, T ;
Goldberg, JM ;
Margossian, H ;
Stevens, L .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 73 (05) :1040-1042
[7]   Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and adnexal surgery [J].
Margossian, H ;
Falcone, T .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A, 2001, 11 (03) :161-165
[8]   One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP) in gynaecological endoscopic surgery [J].
Mettler, L ;
Ibrahim, M ;
Jonat, W .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1998, 13 (10) :2748-2750
[9]   Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Body mass index and outcomes [J].
O'Hanlan, KA ;
Lopez, L ;
Dibble, SL ;
Garnier, AC ;
Huang, GSNH ;
Leuchtenberger, M .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 102 (06) :1384-1392
[10]   LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY [J].
REICH, H ;
DECAPRIO, J ;
MCGLYNN, F .
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 1989, 5 (02) :213-216