Diaphragm electromyograms recorded from multiple surface electrodes following magnetic stimulation

被引:27
作者
Glerant, JC [1 ]
Mustfa, N [1 ]
Man, WD [1 ]
Luo, YM [1 ]
Rafferty, G [1 ]
Polkey, MI [1 ]
Moxham, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll Hosp London, Dept Resp Med, Kings Coll London Sch Med, Resp Muscle Lab, London SE5 9PJ, England
关键词
diaphragm; magnetic stimulation; reproducibility; surface electrodes;
D O I
10.1183/09031936.06.00029005
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The diaphragm compound-muscle action potential (CMAPdi), elicited by unilateral magnetic stimulation (UMS) of the phrenic nerve can be recorded using surface electrodes. However, there is no consensus on the best positioning of surface electrodes and there are no data on the reproducibility of the signal. Using 36 surface electrode pairs, in five healthy subjects, the CMAPdi elicited by UMS and electrical stimulation (ES) were compared and 12 pairs were identified as providing acceptable signals. The latency and amplitude were measured for each CMAPdi, following UMS at 60-100% of maximal stimulator output, in 12 healthy subjects, on two occasions. Latencies obtained using UMS and ES ranged between 6.1-7.33 and 6.25-7.17 ms, respectively. Optimum CMAPdi were not recorded from the same electrode pair in all subjects, or for both hemidiaphragms in each subject. However, the optimal recording site for a particular individual remained unchanged on subsequent testing. When recorded from the optimal site, latencies and amplitudes of CMAPdi elicited on the two occasions were not significantly different. The current study suggests that the use of multiple chest wall electrodes can identify an optimal electrode pair, from which it is possible to obtain reproducible compound-muscle action potential signals.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 342
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]
Electrophysiologic techniques for the assessment of respiratory muscle function [J].
Aldrich, TK ;
Sinderby, C ;
McKenzie, DK ;
Estenne, M ;
Gandevia, SC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 166 (04) :548-+
[2]
STATISTICAL GUIDELINES FOR CONTRIBUTORS TO MEDICAL JOURNALS [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
GORE, SM ;
GARDNER, MJ ;
POCOCK, SJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1983, 286 (6376) :1489-1493
[3]
RECORDING CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SURFACE EMG ELECTRODES [J].
BARKHAUS, PE ;
NANDEDKAR, SD .
MUSCLE & NERVE, 1994, 17 (11) :1317-1323
[4]
ASSESSMENT OF HUMAN DIAPHRAGM STRENGTH AND ACTIVATION USING PHRENIC-NERVE STIMULATION [J].
BELLEMARE, F ;
BIGLANDRITCHIE, B .
RESPIRATION PHYSIOLOGY, 1984, 58 (03) :263-277
[5]
EVALUATION OF HUMAN DIAPHRAGM FATIGUE [J].
BELLEMARE, F ;
GRASSINO, A .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1982, 53 (05) :1196-1206
[6]
PHRENIC-NERVE CONDUCTION STUDY IN NORMAL SUBJECTS [J].
CHEN, R ;
COLLINS, S ;
REMTULLA, H ;
PARKES, A ;
BOLTON, CF .
MUSCLE & NERVE, 1995, 18 (03) :330-335
[7]
Chen R, 1996, MUSCLE NERVE, V19, P324, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199603)19:3<324::AID-MUS7>3.0.CO
[8]
2-F
[9]
Percutaneous magnetic coil stimulation of the phrenic nerve roots and trunk [J].
Chokroverty, S ;
Shah, S ;
Chokroverty, M ;
Deutsch, A ;
Belsh, J .
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 97 (06) :369-374
[10]
PHRENIC NERVE CONDUCTION IN MAN [J].
DAVIS, JN .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1967, 30 (05) :420-&