Disruptiveness of innovations: Measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity

被引:220
作者
Govindarajan, V [1 ]
Kopalle, PK [1 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Amos Tuck Sch Business Adm, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
关键词
innovation; technology; disruptiveness; measurement; reliability; validity;
D O I
10.1002/smj.511
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Strategic management scholars have long explored the broad topic of innovation, a cornerstone in creating competitive advantage. Any attempt at theory construction in this area must encompass reliable and valid measures for key innovation characteristics. Yet, with respect to an important construct, i.e., disruptiveness of innovations, there has been relatively little academic research. Without formalizing the disruptiveness concept with a reliable and valid measure, it is difficult to conduct rigorous research to uncover the causes of the innovator's dilemma and identify mechanisms to help incumbents develop such innovations. In this paper, we develop a scale for the disruptiveness of innovations. We collected data from senior executives (vice president or general manager level) at 199 strategic business units (SBUs) in 38 Fortune 500 corporations and performed a series of analyses to establish the reliability and validity of the disruptiveness scale. The reliability measures, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and subsequent statistical tests strongly support our measure. Further, we also present nomological validity of the disruptiveness construct, thus establishing its predictive validity. Thus, this paper distinguishes the disruptiveness concept from other established innovation constructs, such as radicalness and competency destroying. Finally, we discuss the significance of our results and how this study might be useful to other researchers. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 199
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   INNOVATION - MAPPING THE WINDS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION [J].
ABERNATHY, WJ ;
CLARK, KB .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1985, 14 (01) :3-22
[2]   When are technologies disruptive? A demand-based view of the emergence of competition [J].
Adner, R .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 23 (08) :667-688
[3]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[4]   ASSESSING CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH [J].
BAGOZZI, RP ;
LI, YJ ;
PHILLIPS, LW .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1991, 36 (03) :421-458
[5]   Managing NPD: Cost and schedule performance in design and manufacturing [J].
Bajaj, A ;
Kekre, S ;
Srinivasan, K .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2004, 50 (04) :527-536
[6]   A special issue co-sponsored by the Marketing Science Institute on the subject of really new products [J].
Bayus, BL ;
Griffin, A ;
Lehmann, D .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 1998, 15 (02) :108-110
[7]   HIGH-DEFINITION TELEVISION - ASSESSING DEMAND FORECASTS FOR A NEXT-GENERATION CONSUMER DURABLE [J].
BAYUS, BL .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1993, 39 (11) :1319-1333
[8]  
Bentler P.M., 1989, EQS STRUCTURAL EQUAT
[9]  
Bentler P.M., 1988, COMMON PROBLEMSPROPE, P161
[10]   Organizing for radical product innovation: The overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize [J].
Chandy, RK ;
Tellis, GJ .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1998, 35 (04) :474-487