Effect of a passive jaw motion device on pain and range of motion in TMD patients not responding to flat plane intraoral appliances

被引:42
作者
Maloney, GE [1 ]
Mehta, N [1 ]
Forgione, AG [1 ]
Zawawi, KH [1 ]
Al-Badawi, EA [1 ]
Driscoll, SE [1 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Sch Dent Med, Gelb Orofacial Pain Ctr, Boston, MA 02111 USA
来源
CRANIO-THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR & SLEEP PRACTICE | 2002年 / 20卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/08869634.2002.11746191
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of a passive jaw motion device, the Therabite, and wooden tongue depressors (WTD), in patients with temporomandibular joint and muscle disorders, who did not improve after manual manipulation of the mandible and flat bite plane therapy. Forty-three patients were enrolled in the study and were classified as joint or muscle groups according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD. Twenty-four were assigned to the joint group, and 19 patients were assigned to the muscle group. The patients were assigned at random to three treatment subgroups: 1. passive jaw motion device therapy (Therabite); 2. wooden tongue depressors therapy (WTD); and 3. control group. All subjects received flat bite plane appliance therapy throughout the treatment period. Mandibular range of motion was measured for maximum opening (MO), right and left lateral (Rt. Lateral, Lt. Lateral) and protrusive (Pr) movements. Pain level was also assessed at the beginning and at the end of the treatment. The results suggested that a passive jaw motion device is effective in increasing range of motion in both groups of temporomandibular disorder patients, joint (intracapsular) and muscle (extracapsular). It also appears to decrease pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders. Pain was relieved to a greater degree in the muscle group than the joint group.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 66
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]
[Anonymous], CLIN MANAGEMENT TEMP
[2]
[Anonymous], ACTA ODONTOL SCA S
[4]
MUSCULAR REHABILITATION AFTER ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY [J].
BELL, WH ;
GONYEA, W ;
FINN, RA ;
STORUM, KA ;
JOHNSTON, C ;
THROCKMORTON, GS .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1983, 56 (03) :229-235
[5]
BELL WH, 1992, MODERN PRACTICE ORTH, V2, P1662
[6]
THE EFFECT OF PHYSICAL THERAPY INTERVENTION ON INCISAL OPENING AFTER TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT SURGERY [J].
BRAUN, BL .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1987, 64 (05) :544-548
[7]
MOBILIZATION REGIMENS FOR THE PREVENTION OF JAW HYPOMOBILITY IN THE RADIATED PATIENT - A COMPARISON OF 3 TECHNIQUES [J].
BUCHBINDER, D ;
CURRIVAN, RB ;
KAPLAN, AJ ;
URKEN, ML .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1993, 51 (08) :863-867
[8]
PHYSICAL MEDICINE PROCEDURES AFFECT TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS - A REVIEW [J].
CLARK, GT ;
ADACHI, NY ;
DORNAN, MR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 121 (01) :151-+
[9]
COHEN S G, 1991, Journal of Dental Research, V70, P329
[10]
Temporomandibular disorders .3. Surgical treatment [J].
Dimitroulis, G ;
Dolwick, MF .
AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 1996, 41 (01) :16-20