Evaluating ecosystem management capabilities at the local level in Florida: Identifying policy gaps using geographic information systems

被引:11
作者
Brody, SD [1 ]
Carrasco, V [1 ]
Highfield, W [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Landscape Architecture & Urban Planning, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
ecosystem management; collaboration; ggeographic information systems; land use policies;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-003-3035-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Because ecosystem approaches to management adhere to ecological systems rather than human-defined boundaries, collaboration across jurisdiction, agencies, and land ownership is often necessary to achieve effective management of transboundary resources. Local natural resource and land use planners increasingly recognize that while ecosystem management requires looking beyond specific jurisdictions and focusing on broad spatial scales, the approach will partly be implemented at the local level with the coordination of local policies across larger landscapes. This article evaluates the collective capabilities of local jurisdictions to manage large transboundary ecological systems in Florida. Specifically, it combines plan evaluation with geographic information systems (GIS) techniques to map, measure, and analyze the existing mosaic of management across selected ecosystems in the southern portion of the State. Visual and statistical results indicate significant gaps in the management framework of southern Florida that, if filled, could achieve a greater level of consistency and more complete coverage of ecosystem management policies. Based on the spatial distribution of 58 ecosystem management indicators, notable gaps persist in the southwest coast, southeast coast, and central Everglades ecosystems, particularly for wildlife corridors and collaboration with neighboring jurisdictions. We also test for spatial autocorrelation of ecosystem planning scores and find that local jurisdictions with strong ecosystem management capabilities tend to cluster within specific ecosystems. Based on the findings, we make recommendations on how and where local plans can be strengthened to more effectively attain the objectives of ecosystem approaches to management.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 681
页数:21
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]   LOCAL INDICATORS OF SPATIAL ASSOCIATION - LISA [J].
ANSELIN, L .
GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS, 1995, 27 (02) :93-115
[3]  
ASTHON RE, 1988, HDB REPTILES AMPHI 3
[4]   Preserving biodiversity - Challenges for planners [J].
Beatley, T .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2000, 66 (01) :5-20
[5]   THE INFLUENCE OF STATE PLANNING MANDATES ON LOCAL-PLAN QUALITY [J].
BERKE, PR ;
FRENCH, SP .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 1994, 13 (04) :237-250
[6]  
Blumenthal D, 2000, CONSERV ECOL, V4, part. no.
[7]   Implementing the principles of ecosystem management through local land use planning [J].
Brody, SD .
POPULATION AND ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 24 (06) :511-540
[8]   Measuring the effects of stakeholder participation on the quality of local plans based on the principles of collaborative ecosystem management [J].
Brody, SD .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2003, 22 (04) :407-419
[9]   BRIDGING ORGANIZATIONS AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT [J].
BROWN, LD .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1991, 44 (08) :807-831
[10]  
Bryson J.M., 1992, LEADERSHIP COMMON GO