The relative safety and efficacy of bare-metal and drug-eluting stents in low and high-risk patient subsets. An epidemiological analysis of three sequential cohorts of consecutive all corners (n=6129)

Aims: Sirolimus- and paclitaxel- eluting stents (SES and PES respectively) have been shown to produce a sustained reduction in restenosis and repeat revascularisations as compared to bare-metal stents (BMS) up to four years. There is still limited data about the long-term safety and efficacy of DES in high-risk subgroups. Methods and results: A total of 6,129 consecutive patients were treated during three sequential periods with BMS (n=2,428; January, 2000 to April, 2002), SES (n=866; April 2002 to February 2003) or PES (n=2,835; February 2003 to December 2005). A stratified analysis (including age, gender, diabetes, clinical presentation, treated vessel, multivessel disease, AHA lesion class, bifurcation, in-stent restenosis, average stent diameter <= 2.5 mm and total stented length <= 30 mm) was performed to evaluate possible heterogeneities in treatment effect. At four years, all-cause mortality was identical between the drug-eluting stent (DES) and BMS cohorts (13.5% vs. 13.4%, respectively; Adjusted HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.90 - 1.34) without evidence of heterogeneity in the high-risk patient subsets. Both DES significantly reduced the risk for target vessel revascularisation (TVR) as compared to BMS (TVR: 11.9% vs. 15.7% respectively; Adjusted HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.58 - 0.82) along with a reduced risk for post-operative MI (adjusted HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57 - 0.98), but counterbalanced by a non-significantly higher risk for stent thrombosis (3.1% vs. 1.6%; adjusted HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.82 - 1.95). DES failed to show superiority to BMS in patients with acute myocardial infarction (TVR 10.5% vs. 9.2% respectively; Adjusted HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.82 - 1.93). Conclusions: In a real world patient population, after four years, the overall use of DES was associated with similar all-cause mortality rates and a significantly reduced risk for post-operative MI and TVR as compared to BMS.