Evaluation of the effects of storage in two different swab fabrics and under three different transport conditions on recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria
被引:38
作者:
Roelofsen, E
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Univ Groningen, Lab Med Microbiol, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
Roelofsen, E
van Leeuwen, M
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Univ Groningen, Lab Med Microbiol, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
van Leeuwen, M
Meijer-Severs, GJ
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Univ Groningen, Lab Med Microbiol, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
Meijer-Severs, GJ
Wilkinson, MHF
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Univ Groningen, Lab Med Microbiol, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
Wilkinson, MHF
Degener, JE
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Univ Groningen, Lab Med Microbiol, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
Degener, JE
机构:
[1] Univ Groningen, Lab Med Microbiol, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
Recovery of six anaerobic and five aerobic pathogens from viscose swabs and polyurethane swabs (Culturette EZ) was evaluated quantitatively, and transport in aerobic dry tubes, aerobic Amies transport medium (Transwab), and anaerobic universal transport medium (Port-a-Cul) was compared. The Culturette EZ in aerobic dry tubes gave the highest recovery levels. Data obtained with clinical specimens confirmed these results.