Cervical Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Survival Among Asian Subgroups in California, 1990-2004

被引:34
作者
Bates, Janet H. [1 ]
Hofer, Brenda M. [1 ]
Parikh-Patel, Arti [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif Canc Registry, Inst Publ Hlth, Sacramento, CA 95825 USA
关键词
cervical cancer; Asian ethnicity; incidence rate; trends; survival; human papillomavirus;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.23752
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Aggregated cancer statistics for Asians mask important differences in cancer burden among Asian subgroups. The purpose Of this Study was to describe the relative patterns of cervical cancer incidence, mortality, and survival among Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, South Asian, and Vietnamese women in California, using data from the California Cancer Registry. METHODS. All cervical cancer cases diagnosed among the 6 subgroups and non-Hispanic whites (NHW) from 1990 to 2004 were identified and used to calculate incidence and mortality rates and trends. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate 5- and 10-year survival probabilities by Subgroup, and Cox proportional hazards methodology was used to calculate survival differences adjusted for race and ethnicity, age, stage at diagnosis, socioeconomic status, and treatment factors. RESULTS. Vietnamese and Korean women experienced greater cervical cancer incidence and mortality than NHW women, whereas rates among Chinese, Japanese, and South Asians were comparable or lower. Five-year unadjusted survival probabilities were greatest for South Asians (86%) and Koreans (86%), followed by Vietnamese (82%), Chinese (79%), and Filipinos (79%), as compared with NHW (78%) and Japanese (72%). The adjusted risk of cervical cancer death was significantly lower for South Asians, Koreans, Vietnamese, and Filipinos than for NHW women, but not for Chinese and Japanese. CONCLUSIONS. Cervical cancer incidence rates vary substantially across the major Asian subgroups. Despite higher incidence and mortality rates compared with NHW women, Vietnamese, Koreans, and Filipinos have better survival outcomes. Further Studies are needed to examine the factors behind these survival differences. Cancer 2008;113(10 suppl):2955-63. Published 2008 by the American Cancer Society.*
引用
收藏
页码:2955 / 2963
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, The cancer atlas
[2]  
*APALC, 2005, DIV FAC AS PAC ISL C
[3]  
BROWN M, 2006, CERVICAL CANC CALIFO
[4]  
*CAL CANC REG, CANC REP CAL ABSTR C, V1
[5]  
*CAL CANC REG, CANC REP CAL DAT STA, V3
[6]  
*CAL CANC REG, CANC REP CAL STAND A, V2
[7]  
Casteels Kristina, 2003, Pediatr Diabetes, V4, P29, DOI 10.1034/j.1399-5448.2003.00026.x
[8]  
Castellsague Xavier, 2003, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P20
[9]  
COCKBURN M, 2004, CANC INC MORT CAL TR
[10]   Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2004, featuring cancer in American Indians and Alaska natives [J].
Espey, David K. ;
Wu, Xiao-Cheng ;
Swan, Judith ;
Wiggins, Charles ;
Jim, Melissa A. ;
Ward, Elizabeth ;
Wingo, Phyllis A. ;
Howe, Holly L. ;
Ries, Lynn A. G. ;
Miller, Barry A. ;
Jemal, Ahmedin ;
Ahmed, Faruque ;
Cobb, Nathaniel ;
Kaur, Judith S. ;
Edwards, Brenda K. .
CANCER, 2007, 110 (10) :2119-2152