A randomized, 1-year follow-up study of olanzapine and risperidone in the treatment of negative symptoms in outpatients with schizophrenia

被引:46
作者
Alvarez, Enrique
Ciudad, Antonio [1 ]
Olivares, Jose Manuel
Bousono, Manuel
Gomez, Juan Carlos
机构
[1] Labs Lilly SA, Clin Res Unit, Madrid 28108, Spain
[2] Santa Creu Sant Pau, Dept Psychiat, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Hosp Meixoeiro, Vigo, Spain
[4] Hosp Univ Oviedo, Dept Psychiat, Oviedo, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.jcp.0000222513.63767.de
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of olanzapine compared with risperidone in negative symptoms, after 1 year of treatment, in schizophrenic outpatients with prominent negative symptoms. Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, monitored, open-label, parallel, dose-flexible, 1-year study of outpatients with schizophrenia (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria) with prominent negative symptoms (Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms [SANS] summary score > 10) previously treated with conventional antipsychotics. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with an initial dose of olanzapine 10 mg/d or more (n = 120) or risperidone 3 mg/d or more (n = 115). The primary efficacy measure was the SANS summary score. Secondary efficacy measures included Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale, Calgary Depression Scale, and Social Functioning Scale. The response rate was defined as 30% or more of improvement in the SANS summary score. Results: The mean dose throughout the study was 12.2 mg/d ( +/- 5.8 mg/d) for olanzapine and 4.9 mg/d ( +/- 2.0 mg/d) for risperidone. At I year, olanzapine patients showed significantly higher improvement than risperidone patients on the SANS summary (P = 0.015) and on the affective flattening (P = 0.007) and avolition/apathy (P = 0.028) SANS subscales. There were also significant improvements in favor of olanzapine in the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms summary (P = 0.021), Clinical Global Impression of Severity (P = 0.008), and Social Functioning Scale total (P <= 0.001) scores. The response rate was greater (P = 0.001) in the olanzapine cohort (69.2%) than in the risperidone cohort (48.7%). Olanzapine patients reported less extrapyramidal side effects but a higher incidence of clinically important body weight increase than risperidone patients. Conclusions: Long-term treatment with olanzapine was associated with significantly better improvement in negative symptoms as compared with risperidone-treated schizophrenic outpatients with prominent negative symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 249
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   A DEPRESSION RATING-SCALE FOR SCHIZOPHRENICS [J].
ADDINGTON, D ;
ADDINGTON, J ;
SCHISSEL, B .
SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 1990, 3 (04) :247-251
[2]  
Allison DB, 1999, AM J PSYCHIAT, V156, P1686
[3]  
Andreasen N C, 1990, Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry, V24, P73
[4]  
ANDREASEN NC, 1989, BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, VOL 155, SUPP NO. 7, P49
[5]   Olanzapine versus placebo and haloperidol - Acute phase results of the North American double-blind olanzapine trial [J].
Beasley, CM ;
Tollefson, G ;
Tran, P ;
Satterlee, W ;
Sanger, T ;
Hamilton, S ;
Fabre, L ;
Small, J ;
Ereshefsky, L ;
True, J ;
Nemeroff, C ;
Risch, SC ;
Perry, PJ ;
Potkin, SG ;
Borison, RL ;
James, S ;
Meltzer, HY ;
Iqbal, N ;
Fann, WE ;
Gewirtz, GR ;
Landbloom, R ;
RoyByrne, PP ;
Tuason, VB ;
Carman, JS ;
Stokes, PE ;
Williams, R ;
Ancill, RJ ;
MacEwan, GW ;
Gujavarty, KS ;
Jones, B ;
Lohr, JB .
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 14 (02) :111-123
[6]   Neurocognitive effects of clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder [J].
Bilder, RM ;
Goldman, RS ;
Volavka, J ;
Czobor, P ;
Hoptman, M ;
Sheitman, B ;
Lindenmayer, JP ;
Citrome, L ;
McEvoy, J ;
Kunz, M ;
Chakos, M ;
Cooper, TB ;
Horowitz, TL ;
Lieberman, JA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 159 (06) :1018-1028
[7]   TREATMENT OF NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS IN SCHIZOPHRENIA WITH AMISULPRIDE [J].
BOYER, P ;
LECRUBIER, Y ;
PUECH, AJ ;
DEWAILLY, J ;
AUBIN, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1995, 166 :68-72
[8]  
Bridle C, 2004, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, V8, P1
[9]   REASONS FOR ADMISSION AMONG 6 PROFILE SUBGROUPS OF RECIDIVISTS OF INPATIENT SERVICES [J].
CASPER, ES ;
REGAN, JR .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 1993, 38 (10) :657-661
[10]  
CHOUINARD G, 1993, J CLIN PSYCHOPHARM, V13, P25