Mapping citation patterns of book chapters in the Book Citation Index

被引:35
作者
Torres-Salinas, Daniel [1 ]
Rodriguez-Sanchez, Rosa [2 ]
Robinson-Garcia, Nicolas [3 ]
Fdez-Valdivia, J. [2 ]
Garcia, J. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Navarra, Evaluac Ciencia & Comunicac Cient EC3, Ctr Invest, Navarra 31008, Spain
[2] Univ Granada, Dept Ciencias Comp & IA, CITIC UGR, E-18071 Granada, Spain
[3] Univ Granada, Evaluac Ciencia & Comunicac Cient EC3, E-18071 Granada, Spain
关键词
Information gain; Book Citation Index; Databases; Academic publishers; Citation analysis; Book chapters; Lotkaian distribution; SOCIAL-SCIENCES; GOOGLE SCHOLAR; HUMANITIES; SCOPUS; INFORMATION; MONOGRAPHS; PUBLISHERS; RANKINGS; IMPACT; WEB;
D O I
10.1016/j.joi.2013.01.004
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In this paper we provide the reader with a visual representation of relationships among the impact of book chapters indexed in the Book Citation Index using information gain values and published by different academic publishers in specific disciplines. The impact of book chapters can be characterized statistically by citations histograms. For instance, we can compute the probability of occurrence of book chapters with a number of citations in different intervals for each academic publisher. We predict the similarity between two citation histograms based on the amount of relative information between such characterizations. We observe that the citation patterns of book chapters follow a Lotkaian distribution. This paper describes the structure of the Book Citation Index using 'heliocentric clockwise maps' which allow the reader not only to determine the grade of similarity of a given academic publisher indexed in the Book Citation Index with a specific discipline according to their citation distribution, but also to easily observe the general structure of a discipline, identifying the publishers with higher impact and output. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 424
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, CONS C THEOR PRACT R
[2]   Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities:: The limits of existing databases [J].
Archambault, Eric ;
Vignola-Gagne, Etienne ;
Cote, Gregoire ;
Lariviere, Vincent ;
Gingras, Yves .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, 68 (03) :329-342
[3]   Which h-index? - A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar [J].
Bar-Ilan, Judit .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, 74 (02) :257-271
[4]   Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: A study of sociology [J].
Cronin, B ;
Snyder, H ;
Atkins, H .
JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 1997, 53 (03) :263-273
[5]   Coverage analysis of Scopus:: A journal metric approach [J].
De Moya-Anegon, Felix ;
Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Zaida ;
Vargas-Quesada, Benjamin ;
Corera-Alvarez, Elena ;
Munoz-Fernandez, Francisco Jose ;
Gonzalez-Molina, Antonio ;
Herrero-Solana, Victor .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2007, 73 (01) :53-78
[6]   The power of power laws and an interpretation of lotkaian informetric systems as self-similar fractals [J].
Egghe, L .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 56 (07) :669-675
[7]  
Garcia J. A., 2012, SCIENTOMETRICS, DOI 101007/s11192-012-0854-y
[8]   Information theoretic measure for visual target distinctness [J].
García, JA ;
Fdez-Valdivia, J ;
Fdez-Vidal, XR ;
Rodriguez-Sánchez, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2001, 23 (04) :362-383
[9]   Assessment of humanities and social sciences monographs through their publishers: a review and a study towards a model of evaluation [J].
Gimenez-Toledo, Elea ;
Roman-Roman, Adelaida .
RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2009, 18 (03) :201-213
[10]   RESEARCH PAPERS - WHOS UNCITED NOW [J].
HAMILTON, DP .
SCIENCE, 1991, 251 (4989) :25-25