Social media and scholarly reading

被引:45
作者
Tenopir, Carol [1 ]
Volentine, Rachel [1 ]
King, Donald W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Informat & Commun Studies, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Sch Informat Sci, Knoxville, TN USA
关键词
Information media; Social media; Reading; Information retrieval; User studies; ELECTRONIC JOURNALS; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1108/OIR-04-2012-0062
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine how often university academic staff members use and create various forms of social media for their work and how that use influences their use of traditional scholarly information sources. Design/methodology/approach - This article is based on a 2011 academic reading study conducted at six higher learning institutions in the United Kingdom. Approximately 2000 respondents completed the web-based survey. The study used the critical incident of last reading by academics to gather information on the purpose, outcomes, and values of scholarly readings and access to library collections. In addition, academics were asked about their use and creation of social media as part of their work activities. The authors looked at six categories of social media - blogs, videos/YouTube, RSS feeds, Twitter feeds, user comments in articles, podcasts, and other. This article focuses on the influence of social media on scholarly reading patterns. Findings - Most UK academics use one or more forms of social media for work-related purposes, but creation is less common. Frequency of use and creation is not as high as might be expected, with academics using or creating social media occasionally rather than regularly. There are some differences in use or creation based on demographic factors, including discipline and age. The use and creation of social media does not adversely affect the use of traditional scholarly material, and high frequency users or creators of social media read more scholarly material than others. Originality/value - This paper illustrates that academics who are engaged with traditional materials for their scholarly work are also embracing various forms of social media to a higher degree than their colleagues. This suggests that social media tools could be a good addition to traditional forms of scholarly content as a way to promote academic growth. Social media is not replacing traditional scholarly material, but rather is enhancing their use.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 216
页数:24
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], WE BUILD IT AND PROM
[2]   The cultural shaping of scholarly communication: Explaining e-journal use within and across academic fields [J].
Fry, J ;
Talja, S .
ASIST 2004: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 67TH ASIS&T ANNUAL MEETING, VOL 41, 2004: MANAGING AND ENHANCING INFORMATION: CULTURES AND CONFLICTS, 2004, 41 :20-30
[3]   Scholarly communication and possible changes in the context of social media A Finnish case study [J].
Gu, Feng ;
Widen-Wulff, Gunilla .
ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2011, 29 (06) :762-776
[4]  
JISC, 2010, ACT TOP WEB 2 0
[5]  
King DW, 1999, ANNU REV INFORM SCI, V34, P423
[6]   The Internet and unrefereed scholarly publishing [J].
Kling, R .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 38 :591-631
[7]   Scholarly output: print and digital - in teaching and research [J].
Maynard, Sally ;
O'Brien, Ann .
JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2010, 66 (03) :384-408
[8]  
Nicholas D., 2011, INFORM SERVICES USE, V31, P61
[9]   Scholarly Communication 2.0: Exploring Researchers' Opinions on Web 2.0 for Scientific Knowledge Creation, Evaluation and Dissemination [J].
Ponte, Diego ;
Simon, Judith .
SERIALS REVIEW, 2011, 37 (03) :149-156
[10]   Reasons for the use and non-use of electronic journals and databases - A domain analytic study in four scholarly disciplines [J].
Talja, S ;
Maula, H .
JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2003, 59 (06) :673-691