Invasion marker PAI-1 remains a strong prognostic factor after long-term follow-up both for primary breast cancer and following first relapse

被引:78
作者
Harbeck, N
Thomssen, C
Berger, U
Ulm, K
Kates, RE
Höfler, H
Jänicke, F
Graeff, H
Schmitt, M
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Frauenklin, D-8000 Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Allgemeine Pathol & Pathol Anat, D-8000 Munich, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Med Stat & Epidemiol, D-8000 Munich, Germany
[4] Univ Frauenklin Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
breast cancer; cathepsin D; PAI-1; prognosis; S-phase fraction; uPA;
D O I
10.1023/A:1006118828278
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In 1991, our group was the first to report the prognostic strength of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) in primary breast cancer. The prognostic impact of invasion markers PAI-1 and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in breast cancer has since been independently confirmed. We now report on the prognostic impact of PAI-1 and uPA after long-term median follow-up of 77 months for our cohort (n=316). Levels of uPA, PAI-1, and cathepsin D were determined in tumor tissue extracts by immunoenzymatic methods. S-phase fraction (SPF) was measured flowcytometrically in paraffin sections. Using log-rank statistics, optimized cutoffs were found for PAI-1 (14 ng/mg), uPA (3 ng/mg), cathepsin D (41 pmol/mg), and SPF (6%). In all patients, various factors (PAI-1, uPA, nodal status, SPF, cathepsin D, grading, tumor size, hormone receptor status) showed significant univariate impact on DFS. In Cox analysis, only nodal status (p < 0.001, RR: 3.1) and PAI-1 (p < 0.001, RR: 2.7) remained significant. In node-negative patients (n = 147), PAI-1, uPA, and SPF had significant univariate impact on DFS, whereas in Cox analysis, only PAI-1 was significant. PAI-1 was also significant for DFS within subgroups defined by established factors. In CART analysis, uPA enhanced the prognostic value of PAI-1 and nodal status for determination of a very-low-risk subgroup. For OS, only lymph node status and PAI-1 were significant in multivariate analysis. PAI-1 levels in the primary tumor were also a significant prognostic marker for survival after first relapse in both univariate and multivariate analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 157
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] ABE O, 1992, LANCET, V339, P71
  • [2] Andreasen PA, 1997, INT J CANCER, V72, P1, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970703)72:1<1::AID-IJC1>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-Z
  • [4] Immunoassays (ELISA) of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA): Report of an EORTC/BIOMED-1 workshop
    Benraad, TJ
    GeurtsMoespot, J
    GrondahlHansen, J
    Schmitt, M
    Heuvel, JJTM
    deWitte, JH
    Foekens, JA
    Leake, RE
    Brunner, N
    Sweep, CGJ
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 32A (08) : 1371 - 1381
  • [5] Biochemical assessment of tissue prognostic factors in breast cancer
    Blankenstein, MA
    [J]. BREAST, 1997, 6 (01) : 31 - 37
  • [6] PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF UROKINASE-TYPE PLASMINOGEN-ACTIVATOR (UPA) AND PLASMINOGEN-ACTIVATOR INHIBITORS PAI-1 AND PAI-2 IN BREAST CARCINOMAS
    BOUCHET, C
    SPYRATOS, F
    MARTIN, PM
    HACENE, K
    GENTILE, A
    OGLOBINE, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 69 (02) : 398 - 405
  • [7] DO WE REALLY NEED PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR BREAST-CANCER
    CLARK, GM
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1994, 30 (02) : 117 - 126
  • [8] Clark GM, 1996, DIS BREAST, P461
  • [9] COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
  • [10] RECEPTOR-MEDIATED INTERNALIZATION AND DEGRADATION OF UROKINASE IS CAUSED BY ITS SPECIFIC INHIBITOR PAI-1
    CUBELLIS, MV
    WUN, TC
    BLASI, F
    [J]. EMBO JOURNAL, 1990, 9 (04) : 1079 - 1085