The rate constant of photoinhibition, measured in lincomycin-treated leaves, is directly proportional to light intensity

被引:359
作者
Tyystjarvi, E
Aro, EM
机构
[1] Department of Biology, University of Turku, BioCity A
关键词
photosynthesis; photosystem II; D1; protein; chlorophyll fluorescence;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.93.5.2213
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Pumpkin leaves grown under high light (500-700 mu mol of photons m(-2). s(-1)) were illuminated under photon flux densities ranging from 6.5 to 1500 mu mol . m(-)2 . s(-1) In the presence of lincomycin, an inhibitor of chloroplast protein synthesis, The illumination at all light intensities caused photoinhibition, measured as a decrease in the ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence, Loss of photosystem II (PSII) electron transfer activity correlated with the decrease in the fluorescence ratio, The rate constant of photoinhibition, determined from first-order fits, was directly proportional to photon flux density at all light intensities studied, The fluorescence ratio did not decrease if the leaves were illuminated in low light in the absence of lincomycin or incubated in darkness In the presence of lincomycin. The constancy of the quantum yield of photoinhibition under different photon flux densities strongly suggests that photoinhibition in vivo occurs by one dominant mechanism under all light intensities, This mechanism probably is not the acceptor side mechanism characterized in the anaerobic case in vitro. Furthermore, there was an excellent correlation between the loss of PSII activity and the loss of the D1 protein from thylakoid membranes under low light, At low light, photoinhibition occurs so slowly that inactive PSII centers with the D1 protein waiting to be degraded do not accumulate, The kinetic agreement between D1 protein degradation and the inactivation of PSII indicates that the turnover of the D1 protein depends on photoinhibition under both low and high light.
引用
收藏
页码:2213 / 2218
页数:6
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Adams III WW, 1990, PLANT PHYSIOL, V93, P1184
[2]   PHOTOINHIBITION AND D1 PROTEIN-DEGRADATION IN PEAS ACCLIMATED TO DIFFERENT GROWTH IRRADIANCES [J].
ARO, EM ;
MCCAFFERY, S ;
ANDERSON, JM .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 103 (03) :835-843
[3]   PHOTOINHIBITION OF PHOTOSYSTEM-2 - INACTIVATION, PROTEIN DAMAGE AND TURNOVER [J].
ARO, EM ;
VIRGIN, I ;
ANDERSSON, B .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1993, 1143 (02) :113-134
[4]  
Bjorkman O., 1987, Progress in photosynthesis research. Volume 4.., P11
[5]  
Bjorkman O, 1972, CARNEGIE I WASH YB, V71, P115
[6]  
BRACHT E, 1994, Z NATURFORSCH C, V49, P439
[7]   DETECTION OF A 10 KDA BREAKDOWN PRODUCT CONTAINING THE C-TERMINUS OF THE D1-PROTEIN IN PHOTOINHIBITED WHEAT LEAVES SUGGESTS AN ACCEPTOR SIDE MECHANISM [J].
CANOVAS, PM ;
BARBER, J .
FEBS LETTERS, 1993, 324 (03) :341-344
[8]   PHOTOINHIBITION OF HYDROXYLAMINE-EXTRACTED PHOTOSYSTEM-II MEMBRANES - STUDIES OF THE MECHANISM [J].
CHEN, GX ;
KAZIMIR, J ;
CHENIAE, GM .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 1992, 31 (45) :11072-11083
[9]   PHOTOINHIBITION CAUSES LOSS OF PHOTOCHEMICAL ACTIVITY WITHOUT DEGRADATION OF D1 PROTEIN [J].
CLELAND, RE ;
RAMAGE, RT ;
CRITCHLEY, C .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 17 (06) :641-651
[10]  
CRITCHLEY C, 1994, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V92, P188, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb06670.x