Single-level cervical radiculopathy: clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of four techniques of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and disc arthroplasty

被引:61
作者
Bhadra, Arup K. [1 ]
Raman, A. S. [1 ]
Casey, Adrian T. H. [1 ]
Crawford, R. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp, Stanmore HA7 4LP, Middx, England
[2] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp, Norwich, Norfolk, England
关键词
Cervical radiculopathy; ACDF; Disc arthroplasty; Clinical outcome; Cost-effectiveness; UP SURGICAL FUSION; INTERBODY FUSION; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; LOCKING PLATE; BONE-MATRIX; ALLOGRAFT; OPERATIONS; MORBIDITY; AUTOGRAFT; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-008-0866-8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Although there are several accepted methods of surgical treatment for single-level cervical radiculopathy, the choice depend on the surgeon's preference. The techniques may vary in peri-operative morbidity, short- and long-term outcome, but no study so far has analyzed their cost-effectiveness. This study might give some insight in balancing cost and effectiveness and deciding the right technique. Sixty consecutive patients (15 each group), mean age 36 (range 24-76 years) with single-level cervical disc disease underwent surgical treatment with four different techniques in two centers over the period of 1999-2005. The four groups were-(1) plate and tricortical autograft, (2) plate, cage, and bone substitute, (3) cage only, and (4) disc arthroplasty. The data was collected prospectively according to our protocol and subsequently analyzed. The clinical outcome was assessed comparing visual analog scale (VAS) of neck pain and, short form 12 (SF12) questionnaire both pre- and postoperatively. The radiological assessment was done for fusion rate and postoperative related possible complications at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and final follow-up. The cost analysis was done calculating the operative time, hospital stay, implant cost together. The mean follow-up period was 31 months (range 28-43 months). The clinical outcome in terms of VAS of neck and arm pain and SF12 physical and mental score improvement (P = 0.001) were comparable with all four techniques. The radiological fusion rate was comparable to current available data. As the hospital stay was longer (average 5 days) with plate and autograft group, the total cost was maximum (average A 2,920) pound with this group. There was satisfactory clinical and radiological outcome with all four techniques. Using the cage alone was the most cost-effective technique, but the disc arthroplasty was comparable to the use of cage and plate. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is an established surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy. Single-level cervical radiculopathy was treated with four different techniques. The clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness were compared in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 237
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Indications and trends in use in cervical spinal fusions [J].
Abraham, DJ ;
Herkowitz, HN .
ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1998, 29 (04) :731-+
[2]   COMPARISON BETWEEN ALLOGRAFT PLUS DEMINERALIZED BONE-MATRIX VERSUS AUTOGRAFT IN ANTERIOR CERVICAL FUSION - A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER STUDY [J].
AN, HS ;
SIMPSON, JM ;
GLOVER, JM ;
STEPHANY, J .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (20) :2211-2216
[3]   Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting [J].
Arrington, ED ;
Smith, WJ ;
Chambers, HG ;
Bucknell, AL ;
Davino, NA .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1996, (329) :300-309
[4]   STABILIZATION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE BY ANTERIOR FUSION [J].
BAILEY, RW ;
BADGLEY, CE .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1960, 42 (04) :565-594
[5]   Anterior cervical interbody fusion using autogeneic and allogeneic bone graft substrate: A prospective comparative analysis [J].
Bishop, RC ;
Moore, KA ;
Hadley, MN .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1996, 85 (02) :206-210
[6]   Preliminary experience using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage in the treatment of cervical disc disease [J].
Cho, DY ;
Liau, WR ;
Lee, WY ;
Liu, JT ;
Chiu, CL ;
Sheu, PC .
NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 51 (06) :1343-1349
[7]   THE ANTERIOR APPROACH FOR REMOVAL OF RUPTURED CERVICAL DISKS [J].
CLOWARD, RB .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1958, 15 (06) :602-617
[8]  
Connolly PJ, 1996, J SPINAL DISORD, V9, P202
[9]  
Cooper PR, 2005, NEUROSURGERY, V56, P1050
[10]  
Cooper PR, 2002, NEUROSURGERY, V50, P402