Wilderness canoeing in Ontario: Using cumulative results to update dichotomous choice contingent valuation offer amounts

被引:21
作者
Rollins, K
机构
[1] Dept. of Agric. Econ. and Business, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ont.
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIE RURALE | 1997年 / 45卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1744-7976.1997.tb00155.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
This study used cumulative results to update the distributions from which offer, amounts were drawn in a dichotomous choice contingent valuation of user benefits from wilderness canoeing in Ontario's wilderness parks. An empirical model demonstrates the efficiency gains from using this procedure. Results allow comparison of variation in average daily willingness to pay (WTP) by trip length, indicating decreasing average benefits per trip-day. Two payment vehicles were used Canoeists indicated ranges of WTPs which conformed to expected hypotheses when the payment vehicle was an increase in general trip costs. However, the same respondents indicated an upper bound on WTP when the payment vehicle was an increase in the provincial park backcountry permit price.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   OPTIMAL DESIGNS FOR DISCRETE-CHOICE CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEYS - SINGLE-BOUND, DOUBLE-BOUND, AND BIVARIATE MODELS [J].
ALBERINI, A .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1995, 28 (03) :287-306
[2]   VALIDATION OF EMPIRICAL MEASURES OF WELFARE CHANGE - COMMENT [J].
BOYLE, KJ ;
WELSH, MP ;
BISHOP, RC .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1988, 64 (01) :94-98
[3]   OPTIMAL BID SELECTION FOR DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEYS [J].
COOPER, JC .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1993, 24 (01) :25-40
[4]   INFERENCE AND OPTIMAL-DESIGN FOR A WELFARE MEASURE IN DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE CONTINGENT VALUATION [J].
DUFFIELD, JW ;
PATTERSON, DA .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1991, 67 (02) :225-239
[5]  
HANNEMAN MW, 1984, AM J AGR EC AUG, P332
[6]   SENSITIVITY OF WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY ESTIMATES TO BID DESIGN IN DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE VALUATION MODELS - COMMENT [J].
KANNINEN, BJ ;
KRISTROM, B .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1993, 69 (02) :199-202
[7]   BIAS IN DISCRETE RESPONSE CONTINGENT VALUATION [J].
KANNINEN, BJ .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1995, 28 (01) :114-125
[8]  
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 1993, Federal Register, V58, P4601
[9]   CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS FOR EVALUATING BENEFITS ESTIMATES FROM DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE CONTINGENT VALUATION STUDIES [J].
PARK, T ;
LOOMIS, JB ;
CREEL, M .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1991, 67 (01) :64-73
[10]  
VALLA A, 1994, THESIS U GUELPH GUEL