Susceptibility to chilling injury of peach, nectarine, and plum cultivars grown in California

被引:209
作者
Crisosto, CH [1 ]
Mitchell, FG [1 ]
Ju, ZG [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif, Dept Pomol, Kearney Agr Ctr, Parlier, CA 93648 USA
关键词
Prunus persica; Prunus salicina; internal breakdown; mealiness; woolliness; flesh browning; flesh translucency; gel breakdown; storage temperatures;
D O I
10.21273/HORTSCI.34.6.1116
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
The susceptibility to chilling injury (CI) or internal breakdown (IB) was evaluated in the most currently planted yellow- and white-flesh peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] and nectarine [Prunus persica var. nectarine (L.) Batsch] and plum [Prunus salicina Lindel] cultivars from different breeding sources and fruit types. Cultivars were segregated into three categories (Cat. A, B, and C) according to their susceptibility to CI or IB symptoms (mealiness and flesh browning) when exposed to 0 degrees C or 5 degrees C storage temperatures. Cultivars in Cat. A did not develop any symptoms of CI after 5 weeks of storage at either temperature. Cultivars in Cat. B developed symptoms only when stored at 5 degrees C within 5 weeks of storage. Cultivars were classified in Cat. C when fruit developed CI symptoms at both storage temperatures within 5 weeks of storage. Most of the yellow- and white-flesh peach cultivars developed IB symptoms when stored at both storage temperatures (Cat, C). Most of the new nectarine cultivar introductions did not develop CI symptoms when stored at 0 degrees C or 5 degrees C after 5 weeks (Cat. A). Three out of six plum cultivars tested had CI symptoms within 5 weeks storage at 0 degrees C. However, all of the plum cultivars tested developed CI symptoms when stored at 5 degrees C (Cat, B). The. importance of proper temperature management during postharvest handling was demonstrated.
引用
收藏
页码:1116 / 1118
页数:3
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
ANDERSON RE, 1979, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V104, P459
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, BROOKS OLMO REGISTER
[3]  
Brooks R. M., 1972, REGISTER NEW FRUIT N, V2nd
[4]   CONSUMER PERCEPTIONS OF QUALITY - APRICOTS, CANTALOUPES, PEACHES, PEARS, STRAWBERRIES, AND TOMATOES [J].
BRUHN, CM ;
FELDMAN, N ;
GARLITZ, C ;
HARWOOD, J ;
IVANS, E ;
MARSHALL, M ;
RILEY, A ;
THURBER, D ;
WILLIAMSON, E .
JOURNAL OF FOOD QUALITY, 1991, 14 (03) :187-195
[5]  
Crisosto C. H., 1995, Postharvest News and Information, V6, p17N
[6]   Orchard factors affecting postharvest stone fruit quality [J].
Crisosto, CH ;
Johnson, RS ;
DeJong, T ;
Day, KR .
HORTSCIENCE, 1997, 32 (05) :820-823
[7]  
Dodd M C, 1984, DECIDUOUS FRUIT GROW, V34, P255
[8]  
HALLER MH, 1952, USDA BIBLIOG B, V21
[9]  
HARDING PAUL L., 1934, PROC AMER SOC HORT SCI, V32, P160
[10]  
Hartmann P. E. Q., 1985, Deciduous Fruit Grower, V35, P194