Judicial checks and balances

被引:375
作者
La Porta, R [1 ]
López-de-Silanes, F
Pop-Eleches, C
Shleifer, A
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[2] Yale Univ, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/381480
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the Anglo-American constitutional tradition, judicial checks and balances are often seen as crucial guarantees of freedom. Hayek distinguishes two ways in which the judiciary provides such checks and balances: judicial independence and constitutional review. We create a new database of constitutional rules in 71 countries that reflect these provisions. We find strong support for the proposition that both judicial independence and constitutional review are associated with greater freedom. Consistent with theory, judicial independence accounts for some of the positive effect of common-law legal origin on measures of economic freedom. The results point to significant benefits of the Anglo-American system of government for freedom.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 470
页数:26
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Public goods and ethnic divisions
    Alesina, A
    Baqir, R
    Easterly, W
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1999, 114 (04) : 1243 - 1284
  • [2] [Anonymous], JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABIL
  • [3] [Anonymous], 9756 NBER
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1961, FEDERALIST PAPERS
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1982, COMP LEGAL TRADITION
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1960, CONSTITUTION LIBERTY
  • [7] [Anonymous], SPIRIT LAWS
  • [8] Law and finance:: why does legal origin matter?
    Beck, T
    Demirgüç-Kunt, A
    Levine, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2003, 31 (04) : 653 - 675
  • [9] Buchanan J, 1974, VA LAW REV, V60, P483, DOI DOI 10.2307/1072438
  • [10] *CENTR INT AG, 1996, CIA WORLD FACT BOOK