Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Explanation and Elaboration

被引:1687
作者
Vandenbroucke, Jan P. [2 ]
von Elm, Erik [1 ,3 ]
Altman, Douglas G. [4 ]
Gotzsche, Peter C. [5 ]
Mulrow, Cynthia D. [6 ]
Pocock, Stuart J. [7 ]
Poole, Charles [8 ]
Schlesselman, James J. [9 ,10 ]
Egger, Matthias [1 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Inst Social & Prevent Med, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Med Biometry & Med Informat, Freiburg, Germany
[4] Canc Res UK NHS Ctr Stat Med, Oxford, England
[5] Rigshosp, Nord Cochrane Ctr, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[7] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Med Stat Unit, London WC1, England
[8] Univ N Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[9] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[10] Univ Pittsburgh, Inst Canc, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[11] Univ Bristol, Dept Social Med, Bristol, Avon, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577511
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalizability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies and four are specific to each of the three study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors and readers. This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, one or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated web site (http://www.strobe-statement.org) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research.
引用
收藏
页码:805 / 835
页数:31
相关论文
共 241 条
  • [1] Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials - A reflection of treatment effect or adverse events?
    Als-Nielsen, B
    Chen, WD
    Gluud, C
    Kjaergard, LL
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (07): : 921 - 928
  • [2] Altman D.G., 2005, ENCY BIOSTATISTICS, P708, DOI DOI 10.1002/0470011815.B2A10012
  • [3] REVIEW OF SURVIVAL ANALYSES PUBLISHED IN CANCER JOURNALS
    ALTMAN, DG
    DESTAVOLA, BL
    LOVE, SB
    STEPNIEWSKA, KA
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 72 (02) : 511 - 518
  • [4] STATISTICAL GUIDELINES FOR CONTRIBUTORS TO MEDICAL JOURNALS
    ALTMAN, DG
    GORE, SM
    GARDNER, MJ
    POCOCK, SJ
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1983, 286 (6376) : 1489 - 1493
  • [5] DANGERS OF USING OPTIMAL CUTPOINTS IN THE EVALUATION OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS
    ALTMAN, DG
    LAUSEN, B
    SAUERBREI, W
    SCHUMACHER, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1994, 86 (11) : 829 - 835
  • [6] The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration
    Altman, DG
    Schulz, KF
    Moher, D
    Egger, M
    Davidoff, F
    Elbourne, D
    Gotzsche, PC
    Lang, T
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) : 663 - 694
  • [7] *AM J EP, INSTR AUTH
  • [8] Ambient particulate matter and health effects - Publication bias in studies of short-term associations
    Anderson, HR
    Atkinson, RW
    Peacock, JL
    Sweeting, MJ
    Marston, L
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 16 (02) : 155 - 163
  • [9] Annals of Internal Medicine, INF AUTH
  • [10] [Anonymous], 1997, JAMA, V277, P927