Results of PREVENT III: A multicenter, randomized trial of edifoligide for the prevention of vein graft failure in lower extremity bypass surgery

被引:507
作者
Conte, MS
Bandyk, DF
Clowes, AW
Moneta, GL
Seely, L
Lorenz, TJ
Namini, H
Hamdan, AD
Roddy, SP
Belkin, M
Berceli, SA
DeMasi, RJ
Samson, RH
Berman, SS
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Vasc Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Univ S Florida, Tampa, FL USA
[4] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[6] Corgentech Inc, San Francisco, CA USA
[7] Univ Florida, Albany Med Ctr, Gainesville, FL USA
[8] Vasc & Transplant Specialists, Norfolk, VA USA
[9] Vasc Specialists, Sarasota, FL USA
[10] Tucson Vasc Surg, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2005.12.058
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The PREVENT III study was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multicenter phase III trial of a novel molecular therapy (edifoligide; E2F decoy) for the prevention of vein graft failure in patients undergoing infrainguinal revascularization for critical limb ischemia (CLI). Methods. From November 2001 through October 2003, 1404 patients with CLI were randomized to a single intraoperative ex vivo vein graft treatment with edifoligide or placebo. After surgery, patients underwent graft surveillance by duplex ultrasonography and were followed up for index graft and limb end points to 1 year. A blinded Clinical Events Classification committee reviewed all index graft end points. The primary study end point was the time to nontechnical index graft reintervention or major amputation due to index graft failure. Secondary end points included all-cause graft failure, clinically significant graft stenosis (> 70% by angiography or severe stenosis by ultrasonography), amputation/reintervention-free survival, and nontechnical primary graft patency. Event rates were based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. Time-to-event end points were compared by using the log-rank test. Results: Demographics, comorbidities, and procedural details reflected a population with CLI and diffuse atherosclerosis. Tissue loss was the presenting symptom in 75% of patients. High-risk conduits were used in 24% of cases, including an alternative vein in 20% (15% spliced vein and 5% non-great saphenous vein) and 6% less than 3 mm in diameter; 14% of the cases were reoperative bypass grafts. Most (65%) grafts were placed to infrapopliteal targets. Perioperative (30-day) mortality occurred in 2.7% of patients. Major morbidity included myocardial infarction in 4.7% and early graft occlusion in 5.2% of patients. Ex vivo treatment with edifoligide was well tolerated. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups in the primary or secondary trial end points, primary graft patency, or limb salvage. A statistically significant improvement was observed in secondary graft patency (estimated Kaplan-Meier rates were 83% edifoligide and 78% placebo; P =.016) within I year. The reduction in secondary patency events was manifest within 30 days of surgery (the relative risk for a 30-day event for edifoligide was 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.76; P =.005). For the overall cohort at 1 year, the estimated Kaplan-Meier rate for survival was 84%, that for primary patency was 61%, that for primary assisted patency was 77%, that for secondary patency was 80%, and that for limb salvage was 88%. Conclusions: In this prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial, ex vivo treatment of lower extremity vein grafts with edifoligide did not confer protection from reintervention for graft failure.
引用
收藏
页码:742 / 750
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Alexander JH, 2005, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V294, P2446
[2]   REGULATION OF GENE-EXPRESSION WITH DOUBLE-STRANDED PHOSPHOROTHIOATE OLIGONUCLEOTIDES [J].
BIELINSKA, A ;
SHIVDASANI, RA ;
ZHANG, LQ ;
NABEL, GJ .
SCIENCE, 1990, 250 (4983) :997-1000
[3]   Cell cycle progression - New therapeutic target for vascular proliferative disease [J].
Braun-Dullaeus, RC ;
Mann, MJ ;
Dzau, VJ .
CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (01) :82-89
[4]  
Conte Michael S, 2005, Vasc Endovascular Surg, V39, P15, DOI 10.1177/153857440503900102
[5]   Genetic interventions for vein bypass graft disease: A review [J].
Conte, MS ;
Mann, MJ ;
Simosa, HF ;
Rhynhart, KK ;
Mulligan, RC .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 36 (05) :1040-1052
[6]   Impact of increasing comorbidity on infrainguinal reconstruction: A 20-year perspective [J].
Conte, MS ;
Belkin, M ;
Upchurch, GR ;
Mannick, JA ;
Whittemore, AD ;
Donaldson, MC .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2001, 233 (03) :445-452
[7]   Risk factors, medical therapies and perioperative events in limb salvage surgery: Observations from the PREVENT III multicenter trial [J].
Conte, MS ;
Bandyk, DF ;
Clowes, AW ;
Moneta, GL ;
Namini, H ;
Seely, L .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 42 (03) :456-464
[8]   STRANGER IN A STRANGE LAND - THE PATHOGENESIS OF SAPHENOUS-VEIN GRAFT STENOSIS WITH EMPHASIS ON STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN VEINS AND ARTERIES [J].
COX, JL ;
CHIASSON, DA ;
GOTLIEB, AI .
PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 1991, 34 (01) :45-68
[9]   Long-term stabilization of vein graft wall architecture and prolonged resistance to experimental atherosclerosis after E2F decoy oligonucleotide gene therapy [J].
Ehsan, A ;
Mann, MJ ;
Dell'Acqua, G ;
Dzau, VJ .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 121 (04) :714-722
[10]  
GRUBE E, 2001, AM HEART ASS ANN M L