Demand-side inertia factors and their benefits for innovativeness

被引:22
作者
Stanko, Michael A. [1 ]
Bohlmann, Jonathan D. [1 ]
Molina-Castillo, Francisco-Jose [2 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Business Management, Lonnie C Poole Jr Coll Management, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Univ Murcia, Dept Mkt, E-30100 Murcia, Spain
关键词
Customer-based inertia; Innovativeness; Entry order; New product development; COMMON METHOD VARIANCE; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; MARKET ORIENTATION; NETWORK EXTERNALITIES; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SWITCHING COSTS; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; 1ST-MOVER ADVANTAGE; CUSTOMER; ENTRY;
D O I
10.1007/s11747-013-0332-y
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Inertia reflects a firm's inability to change or innovate and may be fostered by many sources. Though researchers have focused on internal inertia factors, we examine inertia factors within a firm's customer base: switching costs, customer preference stability, and network externalities. New products at 279 firms are examined to assess the role of these demand-side inertia factors in determining innovativeness and, ultimately, financial performance. The inertia factors are hypothesized to have differential innovativeness effects for early and late entrants. Overall, demand-side factors affect innovativeness positively, contrasting with firm-based factors (e.g., routines or assets), which typically inhibit innovativeness. Consumer preference stability is the only factor negatively related to innovativeness, though only for early entrants. Network externalities and switching costs increase innovativeness (particularly for early entrants). Demand-side inertia factors are critical determinants of innovativeness and may now be placed within the previously internally focused set of factors engendering early mover advantage.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 668
页数:20
相关论文
共 134 条
[1]   A demand-based perspective on sustainable competitive advantage [J].
Adner, R ;
Zemsky, P .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (03) :215-239
[2]   When are technologies disruptive? A demand-based view of the emergence of competition [J].
Adner, R .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 23 (08) :667-688
[3]   Survival of firms over the product life cycle [J].
Agarwal, R .
SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1997, 63 (03) :571-584
[4]  
Alpert F.H., 1995, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, V22, P244, DOI [10.1177/0092070394223005, DOI 10.1177/0092070394223005]
[5]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1995, RESOURCE BASED EVOLU
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1996, MASTERING DYNAMICS I
[8]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[9]   The contingent value of responsive and proactive market orientations for new product program performance [J].
Atuahene-Gima, K ;
Slater, SF ;
Olson, EM .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2005, 22 (06) :464-482