Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations

被引:857
作者
Wu, JG [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, Fac Ecol Evolut & Environm Sci, LEML, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
landscape metrics; pattern analysis; scale effects; scaling; scalograms; grain; extent;
D O I
10.1023/B:LAND.0000021711.40074.ae
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Landscape pattern is spatially correlated and scale-dependent. Thus, understanding landscape structure and functioning requires multiscale information, and scaling functions are the most precise and concise way of quantifying multiscale characteristics explicitly. The major objective of this study was to explore if there are any scaling relations for landscape pattern when it is measured over a range of scales (grain size and extent). The results showed that the responses of landscape metrics to changing scale fell into two categories when computed at the class level (i.e., for individual land cover types): simple scaling functions and unpredictable behavior. Similarly, three categories were found at the landscape level, with the third being staircase pattern, in a previous study when all land cover types were combined together. In general, scaling relations were more variable at the class level than at the landscape level, and more consistent and predictable with changing grain size than with changing extent at both levels. Considering that the landscapes under study were quite diverse in terms of both composition and configuration, these results seem robust. This study highlights the need for multiscale analysis in order to adequately characterize and monitor landscape heterogeneity, and provides insights into the scaling of landscape patterns.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 138
页数:14
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Allen R.F.H., 1984, RM110 USDA FOR SERV
[2]  
Allen T. F. H., 1982, Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity
[3]   SEARCHING FOR THE ELUSIVE AGGREGATION EFFECT - EVIDENCE FROM STATISTICAL SIMULATIONS [J].
AMRHEIN, CG .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1995, 27 (01) :105-119
[4]  
[Anonymous], SPATIAL ANAL MODELLI
[5]  
Arbia G., 1996, Geogr. Syst., P123
[6]   EFFECTS OF SENSOR SPATIAL-RESOLUTION ON LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE PARAMETERS [J].
BENSON, BJ ;
MACKENZIE, MD .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 1995, 10 (02) :113-120
[7]  
Bian L, 1999, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V65, P73
[8]   SCALE DEPENDENCIES OF VEGETATION AND TOPOGRAPHY IN A MOUNTAINOUS ENVIRONMENT OF MONTANA [J].
BIAN, L ;
WALSH, SJ .
PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER, 1993, 45 (01) :1-11
[9]   CHARACTERIZING CANOPY GAP STRUCTURE IN FORESTS USING WAVELET ANALYSIS [J].
BRADSHAW, GA ;
SPIES, TA .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1992, 80 (02) :205-215
[10]  
Brown J.H., 2000, SCALING BIOL