An adaptive inverse-distance weighting spatial interpolation technique

被引:1062
作者
Lu, George Y. [1 ]
Wong, David W. [1 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
关键词
spatial interpolation; distance-decay parameter; cross validation; adaptive inverse-distance weighting; kriging;
D O I
10.1016/j.cageo.2007.07.010
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
One of the most frequently used deterministic models in spatial interpolation is the inverse-distance weighting (IDW) method. It is relatively fast and easy to compute, and straightforward to interpret. Its general idea is based on the assumption that the attribute value of an unsampled point is the weighted average of known values within the neighborhood, and the weights are inversely related to the distances between the prediction location and the sampled locations. The inverse-distance weight is modified by a constant power or a distance-decay parameter to adjust the diminishing strength in relationship with increasing distance. Recognizing the potential of varying distance-decay relationships over the study area, we suggest that the value of the weighting parameter be allowed to vary according to the spatial pattern of the sampled points in the neighborhood. This adaptive approach suggests that the distance-decay parameter can be a function of the point pattern of the neighborhood. We developed an algorithm to search for "optimal" adaptive distance-decay parameters. Using cross validation to evaluate the results, we conclude that adaptive IDW performs better than the constant parameter method in most cases, and better than ordinary kriging in one of our empirical studies when the spatial structure in the data could not be modeled effectively by typical variogram functions. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1044 / 1055
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Fuzzy logic model for the prediction of cement compressive strength [J].
Akkurt, S ;
Tayfur, G ;
Can, S .
CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2004, 34 (08) :1429-1433
[2]   Spatial prediction and surface modeling [J].
Atkinson, PM .
GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS, 2005, 37 (02) :113-123
[3]  
Bailey TC., 1995, Interactive spatial data analysis
[4]  
Barnes S., 1964, J. Appl. Meteor., V3, P396, DOI [DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1964)003<0396:ATFMDI>2.0.CO
[5]  
2, 10.1175/1520-0450(1964)0032.0.CO
[6]  
2, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1964)0032.0.CO
[7]  
2]
[8]   Comparative evaluation of spatial prediction methods in a field experiment for mapping soil potassium [J].
Bekele, A ;
Downer, RG ;
Wolcott, MC ;
Hudnall, WH ;
Moore, SH .
SOIL SCIENCE, 2003, 168 (01) :15-28
[9]  
Boots BarryN., 1988, POINT PATTERN ANAL
[10]   THE GENERATION OF SPATIAL POPULATION-DISTRIBUTIONS FROM CENSUS CENTROID DATA [J].
BRACKEN, I ;
MARTIN, D .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1989, 21 (04) :537-543