Dutch occupational physicians and general practitioners wish to improve cooperation

被引:54
作者
Buijs, P
van Amstel, R
van Dijk, F
机构
[1] TNO Arbeid, NL-2130 AS Hoofddorp, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Coronel Inst, Dept Occupat Med, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
occupational physician; general practitioner; sickness absence; occupational health services;
D O I
10.1136/oem.56.10.709
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives-To investigate cooperation between occupational physicians (OPs) and general practitioners (GPs). Methods-Literature review; structured interviews; questionnaires sent to randomised samples of OPs (n=232) and GPs (n=243). Results-Actual cooperation is poor. However, more than 80% of both groups responded that they wan cooperation, aiming at better quality of care. Obstacles identified by OPs include insufficient knowledge among GPs about occupational health services (OHSs) (57%) and their patients' working conditions (52%). OPs also consider that GPs suspect them of serving employers more than employees (44%) and of verifying reasons of absence, with information from GPs (34%). Responses from GPs confirm these two suspicions (48%, response 58%), adding obstacles Like commercialisation of OHS, lack of financial incentives, etc. Both groups are unanimous about prerequisites for improvement, especially guaranteeing the professional autonomy of OPs(OPs 86%,GPs 76%). Conclusion-As a first step to overcome obstacles to cooperation, OPs must clarify their position to GP colleagues. Initiatives have been taken after presenting this study.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 713
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条