Tibial Loading After UKA: Evaluation of Tibial Slope, Resection Depth, Medial Shift and Component Rotation

被引:79
作者
Small, Scott R. [2 ]
Berend, Michael E. [2 ]
Rogge, Renee D. [1 ]
Archer, Derek B. [1 ]
Kingman, Amanda L. [1 ]
Ritter, Merrill A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Rose Hulman Inst Technol, Dept Appl Biol & Biomed, Terre Haute, IN 47803 USA
[2] Joint Replacement Surg Indiana, Mooresville, IN USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; alignment; strain; Oxford Partial Knee System; biomechanics; UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; REPLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.004
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
With increased precision in alignment offered by new generations of instrumentation and customized guides, this study was designed to establish a biomechanically-based target alignment for the balance of tibial loading in order to diminish the likelihood of pain and subsidence related to mechanical overload post-UKA. Sixty composite tibias were implanted with Oxford UKA tibial components with varied sagittal slope, resection depth, rotation and medial shift using patient matched instrumentation. Digital image correlation and strain gage analysis was conducted in static loading to evaluate strain distribution as a result of component alignment. In this model, minimal distal resection and most lateral positioning, neutral component rotation, and 3 degrees of slope (from mechanical axis) exhibited the most balanced strain response to loading following UKA. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 183
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leading to revision [J].
Aleto, Thomas J. ;
Berend, Michael E. ;
Ritter, Merrill A. ;
Faris, Philip M. ;
Meneghini, R. Michael .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2008, 23 (02) :159-163
[2]
[Anonymous], INT CORP DAT
[3]
Total Knee Arthroplasty Has Higher Postoperative Morbidity Than Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Analysis [J].
Brown, Nicholas M. ;
Sheth, Neil P. ;
Davis, Kenneth ;
Berend, Mike E. ;
Lombardi, Adolph V. ;
Berend, Keith R. ;
Della Valle, Craig J. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (08) :86-90
[4]
Callaghan JJ, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P221
[5]
Biomechanical evaluation of proximal tibial behavior following unicondylar knee arthroplasty: Modified resected surface with corresponding surgical technique [J].
Chang, Tsung-Wei ;
Yang, Chan-Tsung ;
Liu, Yu-Liang ;
Chen, Wen-Chuan ;
Lin, Kun-Jhih ;
Lai, Yu-Shu ;
Huang, Chang-Hung ;
Lu, Yung-Chang ;
Cheng, Cheng-Kung .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2011, 33 (10) :1175-1182
[6]
Tibial component overhang following unicompartmental knee replacement-Does it matter? [J].
Chau, R. ;
Gulati, A. ;
Pandit, H. ;
Beard, D. J. ;
Price, A. J. ;
Dodd, C. A. F. ;
Gill, H. S. ;
Murray, D. W. .
KNEE, 2009, 16 (05) :310-313
[7]
Mechanical Evaluation of Large-Size Fourth-Generation Composite Femur and Tibia Models [J].
Gardner, Matthew P. ;
Chong, Alexander C. M. ;
Pollock, Anthony G. ;
Wooley, Paul H. .
ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 38 (03) :613-620
[8]
Goodfellow J., 2006, UNICOMPARTMENTAL ART
[9]
Influence of component alignment on outcome for unicompartmental knee replacement [J].
Gulati, A. ;
Chau, R. ;
Simpson, D. J. ;
Dodd, C. A. F. ;
Gill, H. S. ;
Murray, D. W. .
KNEE, 2009, 16 (03) :196-199
[10]
Structural properties of fourth-generation composite femurs and tibias [J].
Heiner, Anneliese D. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2008, 41 (15) :3282-3284