Evaluation of confidence intervals for a steady-state leaky aquifer model

被引:22
作者
Christensen, S
Cooley, RL
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Earth Sci, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] US Geol Survey, Denver Fed Ctr, Div Water Resources, Lakewood, CO 80225 USA
关键词
confidence interval; nonlinearity; groundwater flow; model; regression;
D O I
10.1016/S0309-1708(98)00055-4
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
The fact that dependent variables of groundwater models are generally nonlinear functions of model parameters is shown to be a potentially significant factor in calculating accurate confidence intervals for both model parameters and functions of the parameters, such as the values of dependent variables calculated by the model. The Lagrangian method of Vecchia and Cooley [Vecchia, A.V. & Cooley, R.L., Water Resources Research, 1987, 23(7), 1237-1250] was used to calculate nonlinear Scheffe-type confidence intervals for the parameters and the simulated heads of a steady-state groundwater flow model covering 450 km(2) of a leaky aquifer. The nonlinear confidence intervals are compared to corresponding linear intervals. As suggested by the significant nonlinearity of the regression model, linear confidence intervals are often not accurate. The commonly made assumption that widths of linear confidence intervals always underestimate the actual (nonlinear) widths was not correct. Results show that nonlinear effects can cause the nonlinear intervals to be asymmetric and either larger or smaller than the linear approximations. Prior information on transmissivities helps reduce the size of the confidence intervals, with the most notable effects occurring for the parameters on which there is prior information and for head values in parameter zones for which there is prior information on the parameters. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:807 / 817
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1974, Introduction to the Theory of Statistics
[2]  
BATES DM, 1980, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V42, P1
[3]  
BEALE EML, 1960, J ROY STAT SOC B, V22, P41
[4]   THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION [J].
BEVEN, K ;
BINLEY, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) :279-298
[5]   DETERMINING THE RANGE OF PREDICTIONS OF A GROUNDWATER MODEL WHICH ARISES FROM ALTERNATIVE CALIBRATIONS [J].
BROOKS, RJ ;
LERNER, DN ;
TOBIAS, AM .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1994, 30 (11) :2993-3000
[6]  
CHRISTENSEN S, 1994, NORD HYDROL, V25, P145
[7]   On the strategy of estimating regional-scale transmissivity fields [J].
Christensen, S .
GROUND WATER, 1997, 35 (01) :131-139
[8]  
CHRISTENSEN S, 1995, CALIBRATION DATA ACC