Development of anisotropic structure in the Earth's lower mantle by solid-state convection

被引:122
作者
McNamara, AK
van Keken, PE
Karato, SI
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Geol Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Dept Geol & Geophys, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1038/416310a
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Seismological observations reveal highly anisotropic patches at the bottom of the Earth's lower mantle, whereas the bulk of the mantle has been observed to be largely isotropic(1-4). These patches have been interpreted to correspond to areas where subduction has taken place in the past or to areas where mantle plumes are upwelling, but the underlying cause for the anisotropy is unknown-both shape-preferred orientation of elastically heterogenous materials(5) and lattice-preferred orientation of a homogeneous material(6-8) have been proposed. Both of these mechanisms imply that large-strain deformation occurs within the anisotropic regions, but the geodynamic implications of the mechanisms differ. Shape-preferred orientation would imply the presence of large elastic (and hence chemical) heterogeneity whereas lattice-preferred orientation requires deformation at high stresses. Here we show, on the basis of numerical modelling incorporating mineral physics of elasticity and development of lattice-preferred orientation, that slab deformation in the deep lower mantle can account for the presence of strong anisotropy in the circum-Pacific region. In this model-where development of the mineral fabric (the alignment of mineral grains) is caused solely by solid-state deformation of chemically homogeneous mantle material-anisotropy is caused by large-strain deformation at high stresses, due to the collision of subducted slabs with the core-mantle boundary.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 314
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Ashby M.F., 1982, DEFORMATION MECH MAP
[2]   SENSITIVITY OF CONVECTION WITH AN ENDOTHERMIC PHASE-CHANGE TO THE FORM OF GOVERNING EQUATIONS, INITIAL CONDITIONS, BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS, AND EQUATION OF STATE [J].
ITA, J ;
KING, SD .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1994, 99 (B8) :15919-15938
[3]   CONVECTION IN A COMPRESSIBLE FLUID WITH INFINITE PRANDTL NUMBER [J].
JARVIS, GT ;
MCKENZIE, DP .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1980, 96 (FEB) :515-583
[4]   Some remarks on the origin of seismic anisotropy in the D" layer [J].
Karato, S .
EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 1998, 50 (11-12) :1019-1028
[5]   Seismic anisotropy in the deep mantle, boundary layers and the geometry of mantle convection [J].
Karato, SI .
PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 1998, 151 (2-4) :565-587
[6]  
Karki BB, 1997, AM MINERAL, V82, P51
[7]  
Kendall J.-M., 2000, GEOPHYS MONOGR SER, V117, P133, DOI DOI 10.1029/GM117P0133
[8]   Constraints from seismic anisotropy on the nature of the lowermost mantle [J].
Kendall, JM ;
Silver, PG .
NATURE, 1996, 381 (6581) :409-412
[9]  
Lay T, 1998, GEODYNAMICS, V28, P299
[10]   The core-mantle boundary layer and deep Earth dynamics [J].
Lay, T ;
Williams, Q ;
Garnero, EJ .
NATURE, 1998, 392 (6675) :461-468