Variation in the effectiveness of biotic defence: the case of an opportunistic ant-plant protection mutualism

被引:52
作者
Di Giusto, B [1 ]
Anstett, MC [1 ]
Dounias, E [1 ]
McKey, DB [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Ecol Fonct & Evolut, CNRS, UPR 9056, F-34293 Montpellier 5, France
关键词
Dioscorea praehensilis; Lilioceris latipennis; tritrophic interaction; herbivory; Cameroon;
D O I
10.1007/s004420100734
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Benefits to plants in facultative ant protection mutualisms are highly variable. This allows examination of the sources of this variation and the mechanisms by which ants protect plants. We studied opportunistic interactions between ants and an extrafloral nectary-bearing vine, Dioscorea praehensilis, during 3 different years. Variation in plant protection among years was striking. Several factors affected the effectiveness of the biotic defence. Stems recently emerged from the underground tuber were self-supporting, contacting no other plants and encountering few foraging ants. Stems then became lianescent, and contact with supporting plants greatly increased ant recruitment. Both species and number of ant workers influenced the effect of ants on the major herbivore, the chrysomelid beetle Lilioceris latipennis. Protective actions included limitation of oviposition (reduction in the number of eggs laid on the plant) and predation, leading to increased larval mortality. The probability of successful predation was strongly dependent on larval size. If temporarily low ant-patrolling activity allows larvae to grow beyond a critical size, their mechanical (thick integument) or chemical (plant-derived compounds in a fecal shield) defences become more effective against ants. Secondary metabolites derived from the host plant thus appear to be important for the anti-predator mechanisms of this beetle, being necessary for its survival and reproduction on a host plant that actively recruits ants as a biotic defence against herbivores.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 375
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Dynamic anti-herbivore defense in ant-plants: the role of induced responses [J].
Agrawal, AA ;
Rutter, MT .
OIKOS, 1998, 83 (02) :227-236
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Statistical Tables
[3]   SPATIAL VARIATION IN THE EFFECT OF ANTS ON AN EXTRAFLORAL NECTARY PLANT [J].
BARTON, AM .
ECOLOGY, 1986, 67 (02) :495-504
[4]   EXTRA-FLORAL NECTARIES AND PROTECTION BY PUGNACIOUS BODYGUARDS [J].
BENTLEY, BL .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1977, 8 :407-427
[5]   The contribution of ant plant protection studies to our understanding of mutualism [J].
Bronstein, JL .
BIOTROPICA, 1998, 30 (02) :150-161
[6]   OUR CURRENT UNDERSTANDING OF MUTUALISM [J].
BRONSTEIN, JL .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 1994, 69 (01) :31-51
[7]   CONDITIONAL OUTCOMES IN MUTUALISTIC INTERACTIONS [J].
BRONSTEIN, JL .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1994, 9 (06) :214-217
[8]  
Burkill HM., 1985, USEFUL PLANTS W TROP, V1
[9]  
CORRENS C, 1888, SITZUNGSBER AKAD MN, V97
[10]   Ant-Homoptera interactions in a neotropical savanna:: The honeydew-producing treehopper, Guayaquila xiphias (Membracidae), and its associated ant fauna on Didymopanax vinosum (Araliaceae) [J].
Del-Claro, K ;
Oliveira, PS .
BIOTROPICA, 1999, 31 (01) :135-144