Assessment of bioaerosols in swine barns by filtration and impaction

被引:70
作者
Predicala, BZ
Urban, JE
Maghirang, RG
Jerez, SB
Goodband, RD
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Kansas State Univ, Div Biol, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[3] Kansas State Univ, Dept Anim Sci & Ind, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00284-001-0064-y
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Bioaerosol concentrations inside one naturally ventilated and one mechanically ventilated swine finishing barn were assessed by sampling air using membrane filtration and impaction (six-stage Andersen sampler), and assayed by culture method. The barns, located on the same commercial farm in northeast Kansas, did not show any significant difference (p>0.05) in concentrations of total and respirable airborne microorganisms. The overall mean total concentrations inside the two barns were 6.6x10(4) colony forming units (CFU)/m(3) (SD = 3.8x10(4) CFU/m(3)) as measured by filtration and 8.6 x 10(4) CFU/m(3) (SD = 5.1x10(4) CFU/m(3)) by impaction. The overall mean respirable concentrations were 9.0x10(3) CFU/m(3) (SD = 4.1x10(3) CFU/m(3)) measured by filtration and 2.8x10(4) CFU/m(3) (SD = 2.2x10(4) CFU/m(3)) by impaction. Total and respirable CFU concentrations measured by impaction were significantly (p<0.05) higher than that by filtration. The persistent strains of microorganisms were various species of the following genera: Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Listeria, Enterococcus, Nocardia, Lactobacillus, and Penicillium. It appears that filtration sampling can be used for a qualitative survey of bioaerosols in swine barns while the Anderson sampler is suitable for both quantitative and qualitative assessments.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 140
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, GUID ASS BIOAER IND
[2]   CONCENTRATION OF RESPIRABLE DUST AND BIOAEROSOLS AND IDENTIFICATION OF CERTAIN MICROBIAL TYPES IN A HOG-GROWING FACILITY [J].
BUTERA, M ;
SMITH, JH ;
MORRISON, WD ;
HACKER, RR ;
KAINS, FA ;
OGILVIE, JR .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1991, 71 (02) :271-277
[3]  
CHATIGNY MA, 1989, AIR SAMPLING INSTRUM, P199
[4]  
CLARK S, 1983, AM IND HYG ASSOC J, V44, P537, DOI 10.1080/15298668391405265
[5]  
CROOK B, 1991, AM IND HYG ASSOC J, V52, P271, DOI 10.1080/15298669191364721
[6]   Sampling and assay of bioaerosols in the work environment [J].
Crook, B ;
SherwoodHigham, JL .
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 1997, 28 (03) :417-426
[7]  
DONHAM K, 1989, BRIT J IND MED, V46, P31
[8]  
Eduard W, 1998, AM IND HYG ASSOC J, V59, P113, DOI 10.1080/15428119891010370
[9]   The development of sampling methods for the assessment of indoor bioaerosols [J].
Griffiths, WD ;
Stewart, IW ;
Futter, SJ ;
Upton, SL ;
Mark, D .
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 1997, 28 (03) :437-457
[10]   THE ASSESSMENT OF BIOAEROSOLS - A CRITICAL-REVIEW [J].
GRIFFITHS, WD ;
DECOSEMO, GAL .
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 1994, 25 (08) :1425-1458