The development and validation of a job crafting measure for use with blue-collar workers

被引:65
作者
Nielsen, Karina [1 ]
Abildgaard, Johan Simonsen [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Ctr Working Environm, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Psychol, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
job crafting; validation; well-being; questionnaire; scale development; CHALLENGE; STRESSORS; CONSEQUENCES; METAANALYSIS; ENGAGEMENT; RESOURCES; EMPLOYEES; BEHAVIOR; BURNOUT; FIT;
D O I
10.1080/02678373.2012.733543
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Job crafting describes a set of proactive behaviours in which employees may engage to shape their work in order to minimize hindering job demands and maximize resources and challenging demands. Such behaviours may be particularly important among blue-collar workers whose jobs are characterized by poor working conditions and low well-being. We present the development and adaptation of a job crafting measure that may be used among blue-collar workers, based on an existing scale by Tims, Bakker, and Derks (2012) that was not specifically developed for blue-collar workers. We test the validity and reliability of the measure in a longitudinal study based on multiple source information from mail delivery workers in Denmark (N = 362 at Time 1; N = 408 at Time 2). Results indicate the presence of five job crafting dimensions: increasing challenging demands, decreasing social job demands, increasing social job resources, increasing quantitative demands and decreasing hindering job demands. These can be reliably measured with 15 items. The measure shows acceptable discriminant and criterion validity, and test-retest reliability. The findings extend the application of the original questionnaire. They also add to knowledge of the job crafting behaviours in which blue-collar workers engage and link them to well-being outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 384
页数:20
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[2]  
[Anonymous], CONTENT ANAL INTRO I
[3]  
[Anonymous], LISREL 8 8 COMP SOFT
[4]  
[Anonymous], LISREL 8 3 USERS REF
[5]  
Bakker A. B., 2007, J MANAGERIAL PSYCHOL, V22, P309, DOI [DOI 10.1108/02683940710733115, 10.1108/02683940710733115, 10.1108/02683940710733115.62]
[6]   Pro-self, prosocial, and pro-organizational foci of proactive behaviour: Differential antecedents and consequences [J].
Belschak, Frank D. ;
Den Hartog, Deanne N. .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 83 (02) :475-498
[7]   Perceiving and responding to challenges in job crafting at different ranks: when proactivity requires adaptivity [J].
Berg, Justin M. ;
Wrzesniewski, Amy ;
Dutton, Jane E. .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2010, 31 (2-3) :158-186
[8]  
Burke RJ, 1998, STRESS MEDICINE, V14, P83, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1700(199804)14:2<83::AID-SMI759>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-C
[10]   Linking Job Demands and Resources to Employee Engagement and Burnout: A Theoretical Extension and Meta-Analytic Test [J].
Crawford, Eean R. ;
LePine, Jeffery A. ;
Rich, Bruce Louis .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 95 (05) :834-848