Post-error adjustments

被引:394
作者
Danielmeier, Claudia [1 ]
Ullsperger, Markus [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, NL-6525 HR Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Max Planck Inst Neurol Res, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
关键词
post-error slowing; post-error reduction of interference; post-error improvement in accuracy; cognitive control; orienting response; inhibition; posterior medial frontal cortex; MEDIAL FRONTAL-CORTEX; ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX; COGNITIVE CONTROL; BRAIN POTENTIALS; PERFORMANCE; CONFLICT; EVENT; SUPPRESSION; MECHANISMS; ATTENTION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00233
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
010107 [宗教学];
摘要
When our brain detects an error, this process changes how we react on ensuing trials. People show post-error adaptations, potentially to improve their performance in the near future. At least three types of behavioral post-error adjustments have been observed. These are post-error slowing (PES), post-error reduction of interference, and post-error improvement in accuracy (PIA). Apart from these behavioral changes, post-error adaptations have also been observed on a neuronal level with functional magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography. Neuronal post-error adaptations comprise activity increase in task-relevant brain areas, activity decrease in distracter-encoding brain areas, activity modulations in the motor system, and mid-frontal theta power increases. Here, we review the current literature with respect to these post-error adjustments, discuss under which circumstances these adjustments can be observed, and whether the different types of adjustments are linked to each other. We also evaluate different approaches for explaining the functional role of PES. In addition, we report reanalyzed and follow-up data from a flanker task and a moving dots interference task showing (1) that PES and PIA are not necessarily correlated, (2) that PES depends on the response-stimulus interval, and (3) that PES is reliable on a within-subject level over periods as long as several months.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1968, INFORM THEORY CHOICE, DOI DOI 10.1002/BS.3830140408
[2]
Triangulating a cognitive control network using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI [J].
Aron, Adam R. ;
Behrens, Tim E. ;
Smith, Steve ;
Frank, Michael J. ;
Poldrack, Russell A. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 27 (14) :3743-3752
[3]
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control [J].
Botvinick, MM ;
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Carter, CS ;
Cohen, JD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (03) :624-652
[4]
Alpha power is influenced by performance errors [J].
Carp, Joshua ;
Compton, Rebecca J. .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 46 (02) :336-343
[5]
Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: An update of theory and data [J].
Carter, Cameron S. ;
van Veen, Vincent .
COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 7 (04) :367-379
[6]
Prelude to and Resolution of an Error: EEG Phase Synchrony Reveals Cognitive Control Dynamics during Action Monitoring [J].
Cavanagh, James F. ;
Cohen, Michael X. ;
Allen, John J. B. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 29 (01) :98-105
[7]
Error detection in the stop signal task [J].
Chevrier, Andre ;
Schachar, Russell J. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2010, 53 (02) :664-673
[8]
Functional Dissociation in Right Inferior Frontal Cortex during Performance of Go/No-Go Task [J].
Chikazoe, Junichi ;
Jimura, Koji ;
Asari, Tomoki ;
Yamashita, Ken-ichiro ;
Morimoto, Hiroki ;
Hirose, Satoshi ;
Miyashita, Yasushi ;
Konishi, Seiki .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2009, 19 (01) :146-152
[9]
Unconscious errors enhance prefrontal-occipital oscillatory synchrony [J].
Cohen, Michael X. ;
van Gaal, Simon ;
Ridderinkhof, K. Richard ;
Lamme, Victor A. F. .
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 3
[10]
Cognitive control in the intertrial interval: Evidence from EEG alpha power [J].
Compton, Rebecca J. ;
Arnstein, Daniel ;
Freedman, Gili ;
Dainer-Best, Justin ;
Liss, Alison .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 48 (05) :583-590