Potential of DNA markers in detecting divergence and in analysing heterosis in Indian elite chickpea cultivars

被引:62
作者
Sant, VJ
Patankar, AG
Sarode, ND
Mhase, LB
Sainani, MN
Deshmukh, RB
Ranjekar, PK
Gupta, VS [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chem Lab, Div Biochem Sci, Plant Mol Biol Unit, Pune 411008, Maharashtra, India
[2] Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri 413722, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Cicer arietinum; general heterozygosity; genetic distance; heterosis; molecular markers;
D O I
10.1007/s001220051187
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Molecular markers such as RAPDs and microsatellites were used to study genetic diversity in 29 elite Indian chickpea genotypes. In general, microsatellites were more efficient than the RAPD markers in detecting polymorphism in these genotypes. Among the various microsatellites, (AAC)(5), (ACT)(5), (AAG)(5) and (GATA)(4) were able to differentiate all 29 chickpea cultivars. The mean value of probability of identical match by chance was 2.32 x 10(-25) using DraI-(ACT)(5), TaqI-(AAC)(5), TaqI-(AAG)(5) and TaqI-(GATA)(4) enzyme-probe combinations. The dendrogram, constructed on the basis of similarity index values, grouped the chickpea genotypes into five main clusters with 8 cultivars genetically distant and outgrouped from the main clusters. To investigate if DNA markers are useful in predicting F-1 performance and heterosis in chickpea, we crossed 8 genotypes having important agronomic characters in a diallel set. The F(1)s and their parents in the diallel set were analysed for agronomic traits for better parent and midparent heterosis. Heterosis was found to be much higher for yield than for yield components that fit a multiplicative model. The analysis of genetic divergence using D-2 statistics clustered the 8 cultivars into two groups. Although molecular marker-based genetic distance did not linearly correlate to heterosis, two heterotic groups could be identified on the basis of the general marker heterozygosity.
引用
收藏
页码:1217 / 1225
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
ALI S, 1986, HUM GENET, V74, P239
[2]   Prediction of heterosis in wheat using coefficient of parentage and RFLP-based estimates of genetic relationship [J].
BarbosaNeto, JF ;
Sorrells, ME ;
Cisar, G .
GENOME, 1996, 39 (06) :1142-1149
[3]   GENETIC DIVERSITY FOR RFLPS IN EUROPEAN MAIZE INBREDS .3. PERFORMANCE OF CROSSES WITHIN VERSUS BETWEEN HETEROTIC GROUPS FOR GRAIN TRAITS [J].
BOPPENMAIER, J ;
MELCHINGER, AE ;
SEITZ, G ;
GEIGER, HH ;
HERRMANN, RG .
PLANT BREEDING, 1993, 111 (03) :217-226
[4]  
Cas R.A. F., 1987, Volcanic Successions Modern and Ancient, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-0951-9_6
[5]  
GRIFFING B., 1956, AUSTRALIAN JOUR BIOL SCI, V9, P463
[6]  
Hallauer AR., 1988, Quantitative genetics in maize breeding, V2nd
[7]   Genetic relationships between peanut and wild species of Arachis sect Arachis (Fabaceae): Evidence from RAPDs [J].
Hilu, KW ;
Stalker, HT .
PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION, 1995, 198 (3-4) :167-178
[8]  
Jokha N. S., 1987, The chickpea, P1
[9]   ALLOZYME VARIATION AND PHYLOGENY IN ANNUAL SPECIES OF CICER (LEGUMINOSAE) [J].
KAZAN, K ;
MUEHLBAUER, FJ .
PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION, 1991, 175 (1-2) :11-21
[10]   INHERITANCE AND LINKAGE RELATIONSHIPS OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND ISOZYME LOCI IN CHICKPEA (CICER-ARIETINUM L) [J].
KAZAN, K ;
MUEHLBAUER, FJ ;
WEEDEN, NF ;
LADIZINSKY, G .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1993, 86 (04) :417-426