GOING SHORT-TERM OR LONG-TERM? CEO STOCK OPTIONS AND TEMPORAL ORIENTATION IN THE PRESENCE OF SLACK

被引:92
作者
Martin, Geoffrey P. [1 ]
Wiseman, Robert M. [2 ]
Gomez-Mejia, Luis R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Business Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Management, Eli Broad Grad Sch Management, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Univ Notre Dame, Mendoza Coll Business, Dept Management, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
关键词
executive compensation; loss aversion; CEO decision making; temporal orientation; available slack; BEHAVIORAL AGENCY MODEL; MYOPIC LOSS AVERSION; RISK-TAKING; DECISION-MAKING; CORPORATE-INVESTMENT; FIRM RISK; COMPENSATION; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; LEADERSHIP;
D O I
10.1002/smj.2445
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research summary: We draw on behavioral agency theory to explain how decision heuristics associated with CEO stock options interact with firm slack to shape the CEO's preference for short-or long-term strategies (temporal orientation). Our findings suggest CEO current option wealth substitutes for the influence of slack resources in encouraging a long-term orientation, while prospective option wealth enhances the positive effect of slack on temporal orientation. Our theory offers explanations for non-findings in previous analysis of the relationship between CEO equity based pay and temporal orientation and provides the insights that CEO incentives created by stock options (1) enhance the effect of available slack upon temporal orientation and (2) can both incentivize and de-incentivize destructive short-termism, depending upon the values of current and prospective option wealth. Managerial summary: We explore how compensation design can play a role in affecting the CEO's preference for short-or long-term strategic projects. When the CEOs have accumulated option wealth, they are more likely to invest in the long term. Yet when they have a large number of recently granted options with the potential to generate significant wealth in the event of successful risk taking, the CEO ismore likely to prefer the short term in order to achieve personal wealth gains more quickly. The more liquid assets the firm holds, the weaker both of the aforementioned effects. An implication for boards is that they should anticipate CEO short-termism if the CEO has been granted new options, underlining the potential negative consequences of option compensation. Copyright (C) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2463 / 2480
页数:18
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Academy of Management review, V6, P29, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMR.1981.4287985
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, HUM PAP LAB MAN, P84
[3]   THE PERSISTENCE AND TRANSFER OF LEARNING IN INDUSTRIAL SETTINGS [J].
ARGOTE, L ;
BECKMAN, SL ;
EPPLE, D .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1990, 36 (02) :140-154
[4]   Risk aversion or myopia? Choices in repeated gambles and retirement investments [J].
Benartzi, S ;
Thaler, RH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1999, 45 (03) :364-381
[5]   MYOPIC LOSS AVERSION AND THE EQUITY PREMIUM PUZZLE [J].
BENARTZI, S ;
THALER, RH .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 110 (01) :73-92
[6]   DISCOUNT RATES INFERRED FROM DECISIONS - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY [J].
BENZION, U ;
RAPOPORT, A ;
YAGIL, J .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1989, 35 (03) :270-284
[7]  
Berle AdolfA., 1991, MODERN CORPORATION P
[8]  
Bliese P.D., 2000, MULTILEVEL THEORY RE, P3, DOI DOI 10.12691/EDUCATION-3-1-14
[9]   Executive compensation and short-termist behaviour in speculative markets [J].
Bolton, Patrick ;
Scheinkman, Jose ;
Xiong, Wei .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2006, 73 (03) :577-610
[10]  
Brealey R.A., 1996, Principles of financial management. New York: McGraw-Hill