Quantifying uncertainty in critical loads: (A) literature review

被引:33
作者
Skeffington, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Dept Geog, Aquat Environm Res Ctr, Reading RG6 6AB, Berks, England
关键词
acid deposition; emission control; environmental policy; GLUE; Monte Carlo analysis; sensitivity analysis; steady state mass balance model; steady state water chemistry model; uncertainty analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s11270-006-0382-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Critical loads are the basis for policies controlling emissions of acidic substances in Europe. The implementation of these policies involves large expenditures, and it is reasonable for policymakers to ask what degree of certainty can be attached to the underlying critical load and exceedance estimates. This paper is a literature review of studies which attempt to estimate the uncertainty attached to critical loads. Critical load models and uncertainty analysis are briefly outlined. Most studies have used Monte Carlo analysis of some form to investigate the propagation of uncertainties in the definition of the input parameters through to uncertainties in critical loads. Though the input parameters are often poorly known, the critical load uncertainties are typically surprisingly small because of a "compensation of errors" mechanism. These results depend on the quality of the uncertainty estimates of the input parameters, and a "pedigree" classification for these is proposed. Sensitivity analysis shows that some input parameters are more important in influencing critical load uncertainty than others, but there have not been enough studies to form a general picture. Methods used for dealing with spatial variation are briefly discussed. Application of alternative models to the same site or modifications of existing models can lead to widely differing critical loads, indicating that research into the underlying science needs to continue.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 24
页数:22
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   HIVAN and medication use in chronic dialysis patients in the United States: Analysis of the USRDS DMMS Wave 2 study [J].
Kevin C Abbott ;
Fernando C Trespalacios ;
Lawrence Y Agodoa ;
Tejinder S Ahuja .
BMC Nephrology, 4 (1) :1-7
[2]   Critical loads of acidity for Irish lakes [J].
Aherne, J ;
Curtis, CJ .
AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2003, 65 (01) :21-35
[3]   A literature review of uncertainties in studies of critical loads for acidic deposition [J].
An, JL ;
Zhou, L ;
Huang, MY ;
Li, H ;
Otoshi, T ;
Matsuda, K .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2001, 130 (1-4) :1205-1210
[4]  
Andersson BI, 1998, EXPERIMENTAL REVERSAL OF RAIN EFFECTS: GARDSJON ROOF PROJECT, P411
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1988, REPORT WORKSHOP HELD
[6]  
[Anonymous], WATER AIR SOIL POLLU, DOI [10.1023/B:WAFO.0000028386.89557.fa, DOI 10.1023/B:WAF0.0000028386.89557.FA]
[7]  
Bak J, 2001, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V1, P265
[8]   Regionalization of critical loads under uncertainty [J].
Barkman, A ;
Warfvinge, P ;
Sverdrup, H .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1995, 85 (04) :2515-2520
[9]   Effects of data uncertainty in the Swedish critical load assessment for forest soils [J].
Barkman, A ;
Alveteg, M .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2001, 125 (1-4) :133-156
[10]   Identifying potentials for reducing uncertainty in critical load calculations using the PROFILE model [J].
Barkman, A ;
Alveteg, M .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2001, 125 (1-4) :33-54