Circulatory status and response to cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart failure

Background We recently reported that some patients with heart failure and exercise intolerance exhibit severe hemodynamic dysfunction during exercise, whereas others have normal cardiac output responses to exercise. We postulated that, patients with preserved cardiac output responses to exercise are limited by deconditioning and would respond to exercise training: whereas patients with reduced cardiac output responses are limited by skeletal muscle underperfusion and would not improve with exercise training. The present study was undertaken to test this hypothesis. Methods and Results Thirty-two patients with heart failure were studied. Hemodynamic response to maximal treadmill exercise was measured; then patients were enrolled in a standard 3-month cardiac rehabilitation program. Peak exercise VO2, lactate threshold, and quality-of-life questionnaires were assessed at 1, 2, and 3 months. Twenty-one patients had normal cardiac output responses to exercise. All 21 patients participated in the rehabilitation program without difficulty, and 9 (43%) responded to rehabilitation, defined as a >10% increase in both peak exercise VO2 and the anaerobic threshold. Of the 11 patients with reduced cardiac output responses to exercise, 3 discontinued rehabilitation because of severe exhaustion, and only 1 qualified as a responder (9%; P<.04 versus preserved cardiac output). Conclusions Patients with heart failure and normal cardiac output responses to exercise frequently improve with exercise training. Patients with severe hemodynamic dysfunction during exercise usually do not improve with training, which suggests that they are limited primarily by circulatory factors.