The evolution of productivity performance on China's dairy farms in the new millennium

被引:18
作者
Ma, H. [1 ]
Oxley, L. [2 ]
Rae, A. [3 ]
Fan, C. [4 ]
Huang, J. [5 ]
Rozellell, S. [6 ]
机构
[1] Henan Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Zhengzhou 450002, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Waikato, Dept Econ & Finance, Hamilton 3105, New Zealand
[3] Massey Univ, Dept Econ & Finance, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
[4] Beijing Municipal Bur Finance, Div Agr, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Acad Sci, IGSNRR, Ctr Chinese Agr Policy, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[6] Stanford Univ, Freeman Spogli Inst, S ARARC, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
China; dairy farm; total factor productivity; technical efficiency; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY; DISTANCE FUNCTION; DECOMPOSITION;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2012-5529
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
China's dairy farm structure has experienced fundamental changes across farm types. As the number of backyard farms has dramatically declined, the share of dairy cows from backyard farms has decreased by 22.4% from 2003 to 2008. However, the herd numbers of larger dairy farms have increased. In particular, the share of dairy cows has risen by 18.8% on small farms, by 22.2% on medium farms, and by 80.8% on large farms over the same period. Total factor productivity was decomposed into technical efficiency and technological change on China's dairy farms using the stochastic production frontier framework. The estimated results indicate that patterns of productivity growth appear to have shifted in the 2000s compared with the 1990s, from generally driven by technological change to exclusively driven by technological change on backyard and small farms and uniquely driven by the improvement of technical efficiency on large farms. Tests of the econometric assumption indicate that the variations in total factor productivity growth patterns across farm types and regions are likely caused by the feed input biases and cropping production practice.
引用
收藏
页码:7074 / 7085
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
ACPCRD (Agricultural Commodity Production Cost and Return Data), 2005, AGR COMM PROD COST R
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, AM J AGR ECON
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, 9607 CEPA U NEW ENGL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, CHIN DAIR STAT YB
[5]  
Battese G.E., 1993, Working Papers in Econometrics and Applied Statistics No 69, V69
[6]  
Battese G.E., 1995, Empirical Economics, V20, P325, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01205442, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205442]
[7]  
Chen B., 2012, CHINA DAIRY, V1, P29
[8]  
Chen E. J., 1997, SCH HOUSEHOLD FARM N
[9]   Technical efficiency of European railways: a distance function approach [J].
Coelli, T ;
Perelman, S .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2000, 32 (15) :1967-1976
[10]  
Fu Y., 2009, CHINA DAIRY, V11, P72