Efficacy and safety of a once-daily fixed-dose combination of abacavir/lamivudine compared with abacavir twice daily and lamivudine once daily as separate entities in antiretroviral-experienced HIV-1-infected patients (CAL30001 study)

被引:22
作者
LaMarca, A
Clumeck, N
Plettenberg, A
Domingo, P
Fu, KS
Craig, C
Zhao, H
Watson, M
Gordon, D
Scott, T
机构
[1] GlaxoSmithKline, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[2] Therafirst Med, Ft Lauderdale, FL USA
[3] CHU St Pierre, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Inst Interdisziplinaere Infektiol & Immunol GmbH, Hamburg, Germany
[5] Hosp St Greu & St Paublo, Barcelona, Spain
[6] GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, Herts, England
[7] GlaxoSmithKline, Greenford, Middx, England
关键词
abacavir; lamivudine; fixed-dose combination; antiretroviral therapy; HIV;
D O I
10.1097/01.qai.0000214821.33905.5c
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: A one-tablet, once-daily abacavir/lamivudine fixed-dose combination (FDC) has been recently approved to treat HIV-1 infection. Methods: A randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study to compare the efficacy and safety of the FDC group to the separate entities (SE) group, in combination with tenofovir and a new protease inhibitor or nonncleoside reverse transcription inhibitor in antiretroviral-experienced adults experiencing virologic failure (VF). Eligible subjects had viral loads > 1000 copies/mL with :<= 3 nonnucleoside reverse transcription inhibitor-associated mutations. The primary efficacy end point was time-average changed from baseline (average area under the Curve minus baseline) in plasma HIV-1 RNA over 48 weeks. Results: A total of 186 subjects were enrolled. The average area under the curve minus baseline was - 1.65 and - 1.83 log(10) copies/ mL in the FDC and SE groups, respectively (intention to treat; 95% confidence interval: -0.13, 0.38). Patients in the FDC (50%) and SE groups (47%) achieved viral loads < 50 copies/mL based oil the time to loss of virologic response algorithm. VF was low and similar ill both groups (FDC, 16%; SE, 18%). Tolerability was similar between the 2 groups. Conclusions: The FDC group had noninferior efficacy over 48 weeks to the SE group in treatment-experienced subjects with VF.
引用
收藏
页码:598 / 606
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
BARTLETT JA, 2004, 15 INT AIDS C BANGK
[2]  
*CDC, 1992, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V18, P1
[3]  
CLUMECK N, 2004, 44 INT C ANT AG CHEM
[4]   Updated clinical risk factor analysis of suspected hypersensitivity reactions to abacavir [J].
Cutrell, AG ;
Hernandez, JE ;
Fleming, JW ;
Edwards, MT ;
Moore, MA ;
Brothers, CH ;
Scott, TR .
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2004, 38 (12) :2171-2172
[5]  
D'Aquila Richard T, 2003, Top HIV Med, V11, P92
[6]   Abacavir versus zidovudine combined with lamivudine and efavirenz, for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults [J].
DeJesus, E ;
Herrera, G ;
Teofilo, E ;
Gerstoft, J ;
Buendia, CB ;
Brand, JD ;
Brothers, CH ;
Hernandez, J ;
Castillo, SA ;
Bonny, T ;
Lanier, ER ;
Scott, TR .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 39 (07) :1038-1046
[7]  
*DHHS HJ KAIS FAM, 2004, GUID US ANT AG HIV I
[8]  
Division of AIDS, DIV AIDS TABL GRAD S
[9]  
FARTHING C, 2003, ANTIVIR THER S, V8, pS195
[10]  
*FDA, 2002, GUID IND ANT DRUG US