Informed consent for exome sequencing in diagnostics: exploring first experiences and views of professionals and patients

被引:32
作者
Rigter, T. [1 ]
van Aart, C. J. . A. [1 ]
Elting, M. W. [2 ]
Waisfisz, Q. [2 ]
Cornel, M. C. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Henneman, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Clin Genet, Sect Community Genet, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Clin Genet, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Ctr Med Syst Biol, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] CSG Ctr Soc & Life Sci, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
qualitative research; incidental findings; molecular diagnostics; informed consent; exome sequencing; unsolicited findings; high-throughput nucleotide sequencing; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; RECOMMENDATIONS; CHALLENGES; GENETICS; PERSPECTIVES; GENOMICS;
D O I
10.1111/cge.12299
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Next-generation sequencing is increasingly being chosen as a diagnostic tool for cases of expected genetic, but unresolved origin. The consequential increased need for decisions on disclosure of unsolicited findings poses a challenge for the informed consent procedure. This study explored the first experiences with, and needs for, the informed consent procedure in diagnostic exome sequencing, with the stakeholders involved. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 professional experts and one professional gave a written response. Furthermore, the counseling process was observed in three cases where exome sequencing was offered, followed by interviews with the patient (representative) and the genetic counselor. The respondents not only preferred an opt-out for unsolicited findings but also identified many challenges and therefore more experiences with exome sequencing was considered needed. Context-dependent decision-making was observed and an Advisory Board for unsolicited findings was considered helpful while doubts were raised about the feasibility and the possibility of undermining patients' autonomy. Finally, respondents brought up the complexity of information provision, and division of responsibilities between clinicians and the lab. These challenges and needs, raised by stakeholders involved, provide more insight in the next steps needed for an optimal informed consent procedure for exome sequencing in diagnostics.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 422
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Informed consent for whole-genome sequencing studies in the clinical setting. Proposed recommendations on essential content and process [J].
Ayuso, Carmen ;
Millan, Jose M. ;
Mancheno, Marta ;
Dal-Re, Rafael .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2013, 21 (10) :1054-1059
[2]   Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: Meeting the challenge one bin at a time [J].
Berg, Jonathan S. ;
Khoury, Muin J. ;
Evans, James P. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 13 (06) :499-504
[3]   Opportunities and challenges for the integration of massively parallel genomic sequencing into clinical practice: lessons from the ClinSeq project [J].
Biesecker, Leslie G. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 14 (04) :393-398
[4]   Ethics watch NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING: DOES THE NEXT GENERATION STILL HAVE A RIGHT TO AN OPEN FUTURE? [J].
Bredenoord, Annelien L. ;
de Vries, Martine C. ;
van Delden, Johannes J. M. .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2013, 14 (05) :306-306
[5]   Feedback of Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants: In Favor of a Qualified Disclosure Policy [J].
Bredenoord, Annelien L. ;
Onland-Moret, N. Charlotte ;
Van Delden, Johannes J. M. .
HUMAN MUTATION, 2011, 32 (08) :861-867
[6]   Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk! [J].
Burke, Wylie ;
Antommaria, Armand H. Matheny ;
Bennett, Robin ;
Botkin, Jeffrey ;
Clayton, Ellen Wright ;
Henderson, Gail E. ;
Holm, Ingrid A. ;
Jarvik, Gail P. ;
Khoury, Muin J. ;
Knoppers, Bartha Maria ;
Press, Nancy A. ;
Ross, Lainie Friedman ;
Rothstein, Mark A. ;
Saal, Howard ;
Uhlmann, Wendy R. ;
Wilfond, Benjamin ;
Wolf, Susan M. ;
Zimmern, Ron .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 15 (11) :854-859
[7]   The legal risks of returning results of genomics research [J].
Clayton, Ellen Wright ;
McGuire, Amy L. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 14 (04) :473-477
[8]   Diagnostic Exome Sequencing in Persons with Severe Intellectual Disability [J].
de Ligt, Joep ;
Willemsen, Marjolein H. ;
van Bon, Bregje W. M. ;
Kleefstra, Tjitske ;
Yntema, Helger G. ;
Kroes, Thessa ;
Vulto-van Silfhout, Anneke T. ;
Koolen, David A. ;
de Vries, Petra ;
Gilissen, Christian ;
del Rosario, Marisol ;
Hoischen, Alexander ;
Scheffer, Hans ;
de Vries, Bert B. A. ;
Brunner, Han G. ;
Veltman, Joris A. ;
Vissers, Lisenka E. L. M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 367 (20) :1921-1929
[9]   Description and pilot results from a novel method for evaluating return of incidental findings from next-generation sequencing technologies [J].
Goddard, Katrina A. B. ;
Whitlock, Evelyn P. ;
Berg, Jonathan S. ;
Williams, Marc S. ;
Webber, Elizabeth M. ;
Webster, Jennifer A. ;
Lin, Jennifer S. ;
Schrader, Kasmintan A. ;
Campos-Outcalt, Doug ;
Offit, Kenneth ;
Feigelson, Heather Spencer ;
Hollombe, Celine .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 15 (09) :721-728
[10]   ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing [J].
Green, Robert C. ;
Berg, Jonathan S. ;
Grody, Wayne W. ;
Kalia, Sarah S. ;
Korf, Bruce R. ;
Martin, Christa L. ;
McGuire, Amy L. ;
Nussbaum, Robert L. ;
O'Daniel, Julianne M. ;
Ormond, Kelly E. ;
Rehm, Heidi L. ;
Watson, Michael S. ;
Williams, Marc S. ;
Biesecker, Leslie G. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 15 (07) :565-574