From reductionism to systems thinking: How the shipping sector can address sulphur regulation and tackle climate change

被引:30
作者
Gilbert, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Tyndall Ctr Climate Change Res, Sch Mech Aerosp & Civil Engn, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Shipping; Climate change; Mitigation; Sulphur; CO2; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2013.07.009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
083001 [环境科学];
摘要
The shipping sector is required to reduce fuel sulphur content to 0.1% in Emission Control Areas by 2015 and to 0.5% globally by 2020. Although this is demanding, a greater challenge for all sectors is climate change. However, the three options to comply with sulphur regulation do little to address this challenge. With a deep-seated change to the type of fuel burnt in marine engines, this should be seen as an opportunity to explore co-benefits of sulphur and carbon reduction - instead of taking a short-sighted approach to the problem. It is argued here that the upcoming sulphur regulations should be postponed and instead, a co-ordinated suite of regulations should be implemented that tackles cumulative CO2 emissions and localised SOx emissions in chorus. This would ensure that less developed, yet more radical, step-change forms of propulsion such as wind, battery and biofuels are introduced from the outset - reducing the risks of infrastructure lock-in and preventing the lock-out of technologies that can meaningfully reduce absolute emissions from the sector. (C) 2013 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 378
页数:3
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
Anderson K, 2012, CARBON MANAG, V3, P615, DOI [10.4155/CMT.12.63, 10.4155/cmt.12.63]
[2]
[Anonymous], 2022, IND ASS UKS HEAT BUI
[3]
A comparative life cycle assessment of marine fuels: liquefied natural gas and three other fossil fuels [J].
Bengtsson, S. ;
Andersson, K. ;
Fridell, E. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART M-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR THE MARITIME ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 225 (M2) :97-110
[4]
Broderick J., 2011, Shale gas: an updated assessment of environmental an climate change impacts
[5]
Delft CE, 2009, ENVC3ATA20080016 DG
[6]
DNV, 2012, PATHW LOW CARB SHIPP
[7]
Gilbert P., 2012, P INT C TECHN OP LOG
[8]
Holloway J., 2013, P SEAAT C 2013 FUELL
[9]
Horgen OM, 2012, SNAME GL GR M
[10]
International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT), 2011, RED GREENH GAS EM SH