Comparison of effectiveness and required time of two surveillance methods in intensive care patients

被引:12
作者
Boulétreau, A
Dettenkofer, M
Forster, DH
Babikir, R
Hauer, T
Schulgen, G
Daschner, FD
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Nancy Brabois, Serv Hyg Hosp, F-54511 Vandoeuvre Nancy, France
[2] Univ Hosp Nancy, Nancy, France
[3] Univ Hosp, Inst Environm Med, Freiburg, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp, Hosp Epidemiol, Freiburg, Germany
[5] Univ Hosp, Inst Med Biometry & Med Informat, Freiburg, Germany
关键词
surveillance; nosocomial infection; ICU;
D O I
10.1053/jhin.1998.0530
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The intensive care unit (ICU) standardized protocol of the NNIS (National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance) system is a surveillance method of hospital acquired infections (HAI), which provides device-associated infection rates. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and the required time for data collection and analysis of a selective surveillance method (SSM) derived from the NNIS I:CU surveillance protocol, and to compare its data with that of a reference surveillance method (RSM). The sensitivity, specificity and the positive predictive value (PPV) of the RSM were 87.5, 100 and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and the PPV of the SSM were 59.4 97.6 and 79.2%, respectively. Considering device-related infections only (ventilator-related pneumonia, catheter-related urinary tract infections, central line-related sepsis), the sensitivities of the RSM and the SSM were 80.9 and 90.5%, respectively. The SSM required only one third of the time of the RSM (1.1 h and 3.4 h per 10 beds per week with the SSM and the RSM, respectively). We conclude that the SSM has a very high sensitivity for detecting device associated infections, but is not sensitive enough for surveying all types of HAI.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 289
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
AGNESTI A, 1990, CATEGORICAL DATA ANA
[2]   NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS - VALIDATION OF SURVEILLANCE AND COMPUTER MODELING TO IDENTIFY PATIENTS AT RISK [J].
BRODERICK, A ;
MORI, M ;
NETTLEMAN, MD ;
STREED, SA ;
WENZEL, RP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 131 (04) :734-742
[3]  
Centers forDisease Control Prevention., 1988, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V37, P1
[4]  
Ehrenkranz NJ, 1995, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V16, P697
[5]   THE IMPACT OF SURVEYS ON HOSPITAL INFECTION [J].
EMMERSON, AM .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1995, 30 :421-440
[6]  
Emori TG, 1998, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V19, P308
[7]   NATIONAL NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (NNIS) - DESCRIPTION OF SURVEILLANCE METHODS [J].
EMORI, TG ;
CULVER, DH ;
HORAN, TC ;
JARVIS, WR ;
WHITE, JW ;
OLSON, DR ;
BANERJEE, S ;
EDWARDS, JR ;
MARTONE, WJ ;
GAYNES, RP ;
HUGHES, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 1991, 19 (01) :19-35
[8]   LARGE SAMPLE STANDARD ERRORS OF KAPPA AND WEIGHTED KAPPA [J].
FLEISS, JL ;
COHEN, J ;
EVERITT, BS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1969, 72 (05) :323-&
[9]  
FLEISS JL, 1981, STAT METHODS RATE PR
[10]  
FREEMAN J, 1981, REV INFECT DIS, V3, P668