An evaluation of some factors affecting the accuracy of classification by an artificial neural network

被引:207
作者
Foody, GM [1 ]
Arora, MK [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV WALES SWANSEA,DEPT GEOG,SWANSEA SA2 8PP,W GLAM,WALES
关键词
D O I
10.1080/014311697218764
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Artificial neural networks are attractive for the classification of remotely sensed data. However, a wide ranee of factors influence the accuracy with which a data set may be classified. In this paper, the effect of four factors on the accuracy with which agricultural crops may be classified from airborne thematic mapper (ATM) data was investigated. These factors related to the dimensionality of the remotely sensed data, the neural network architecture, and the characteristics of the training and testing sets. A total of 288 classifications were performed and their accuracies evaluated. The artificial neural networks were able to classify the data to high accuracies, with kappa coefficients of up to 0 . 97 obtained, but the accuracy derived was highly dependent on the factors investigated. A log-linear modelling approach was used to evaluate the simultaneous effect of the factors on classification accuracy. Variations in the dimensionality of the data set, as well as the training and testing set characteristics had a significant effect on classification accuracy. The network architecture, specifically the number of hidden units and layers, did not, however, have a significant effect on classification accuracy in this investigation. This highlights the need to consider a broader set of issues than network architecture when using an artificial neural network for image classification.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 810
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Ahmad S, 1989, ADV NEURAL INFORMATI, P160
  • [2] Aleksander I., 1990, An introduction to neural computing
  • [3] Log-linear modelling for the evaluation of the variables affecting the accuracy of probabilistic, fuzzy and neural network classifications
    Arora, MK
    Foody, GM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1997, 18 (04) : 785 - 798
  • [4] USING MUTUAL INFORMATION FOR SELECTING FEATURES IN SUPERVISED NEURAL-NET LEARNING
    BATTITI, R
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 1994, 5 (04): : 537 - 550
  • [5] What Size Net Gives Valid Generalization?
    Baum, Eric B.
    Haussler, David
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1989, 1 (01) : 151 - 160
  • [6] NEURAL NETWORK APPROACHES VERSUS STATISTICAL-METHODS IN CLASSIFICATION OF MULTISOURCE REMOTE-SENSING DATA
    BENEDIKTSSON, JA
    SWAIN, PH
    ERSOY, OK
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1990, 28 (04): : 540 - 552
  • [7] Campbell J.B., 1987, INTRO REMOTE SENSING
  • [8] CAMPBELL JB, 1981, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V47, P355
  • [9] CONGALTON RG, 1988, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V54, P593
  • [10] CONGALTON RG, 1983, NASA126171703