Impact of the Minimum Pricing Policy and introduction of brand (generic) substitution into the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in Australia

被引:35
作者
McManus, P
Birkett, DJ
Dudley, J
Stevens, A
机构
[1] Dept Hlth & Aged Care, Drug Utilisat Subcomm MDP 83, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] Flinders Med Ctr, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
drug utilization; pharmacoepidemiology; generic substitution; brand premium; patient tracking;
D O I
10.1002/pds.603
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose To describe the effects of introducing the Minimum Pricing Policy (MPP) and generic (brand) substitution in 1990 and 1994 respectively on the dispensing of Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) prescriptions both at the aggregate and individual patient level. Methods The relative proportion of prescriptions with a brand premium and those at benchmark was examined 4 years after introduction of the MPP and again 5 years later after generic substitution by pharmacists was permitted. To determine the impact of a price signal at the individual level, case studies involving a patient tracking methodology were conducted on two drugs (fluoxetine and ranitidine) that received a brand premium. Results From a zero base when the MPP was introduced in 1990, there were 5A million prescriptions (17%) dispensed for benchmark products 4 years later in 1994. At this stage generic (brand) substitution by pharmacists was then permitted and the market share of benchmark brands increased to 45% (25.2 million) by 1999. In the patient tracking studies, a significantly lower proportion of patients was still taking the premium brand of fluoxetine 3 months after the introduction of a price signal compared with patients taking paroxetine which did not have a generic competitor. This was also the case for the premium brand of ranitidine when compared to famotidine The size of the price signal also had a marked effect on dispensing behaviour with the drug with the larger premium (fluoxetine) showing a significantly greater switch away from the premium brand to the benchmark product. Conclusions The introduction in 1990 of the Minimum Pricing Policy without allowing generic substitution had a relatively small impact on the selection of medicines within the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. However the effect of generic substitution at the pharmacist level, which was introduced in December 1994, resulted in a marked increase in the percentage of eligible PBS items dispensed at benchmark. Case studies showed a larger premium resulted in a greater shift of patients from drugs with a brand premium to the benchmark alternative. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 300
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
*AGPS, 1995, PHARM BEN PRIC AUTH
[2]  
*COMM DEP HLTH FAM, 1998, AUSTR STAT MED 1997
[3]  
*COMM DEP HUM SERV, 1994, SCHED PHARM BEN APPR
[4]  
HOBBS M, 1995, AUSTR DOCTOR 0210, P8
[5]   Tracking high users of pethidine after restrictions were placed on PBS supply [J].
McManus, P ;
Birkett, D ;
Mant, A .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1999, 171 (05) :276-276
[6]   Prescription use by patients with concession cards [J].
McManus, P ;
Birkett, DJ ;
Mant, A .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1998, 169 (05) :285-286
[7]  
Messenger A., 1995, AUSTR DOCTOR 0604, P4
[8]  
*STATACORP, 1999, STAT STAT SOFTW REL
[9]   Trends of generic substitution in community pharmacies [J].
Suh, DC .
PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE, 1999, 21 (06) :260-265
[10]  
United States. Congressional Budget Office, 1998, INCR COMP GEN DRUGS