Evaluation of the quality of care of a multi-disciplinary risk factor assessment and management programme (RAMP) for diabetic patients

被引:49
作者
Fung, Colman S. C. [1 ]
Chin, Weng Yee [1 ]
Dai, Daisy S. K. [2 ]
Kwok, Ruby L. P. [2 ]
Tsui, Eva L. H. [3 ]
Wan, Yuk Fai [1 ]
Wong, Wendy [1 ]
Wong, Carlos K. H. [1 ]
Fong, Daniel Y. T. [4 ]
Lam, Cindy L. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Family Med & Primary Care, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Hosp Author, Hosp Author Head Off, Primary & Community Serv Dept, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Hosp Author, Hosp Author Head Off, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Hong Kong, Sch Nursing, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Quality of life; Primary care; Prevention; Primary health care; Management programme; Risk prediction; Risk stratification; ENABLEMENT INSTRUMENT PEI; KONG CHINESE PATIENTS; VALIDATION; OUTCOMES; SCORE;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2296-13-116
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a common chronic disease associated with multiple clinical complications. Management guidelines have been established which recommend a risk-stratified approach to managing these patients in primary care. This study aims to evaluate the quality of care (QOC) and effectiveness of a multi-disciplinary risk assessment and management programme (RAMP) for type 2 diabetic patients attending government-funded primary care clinics in Hong Kong. The evaluation will be conducted using a structured and comprehensive evidence-based evaluation framework. Method/design: For evaluation of the quality of care, a longitudinal study will be conducted using the Action Learning and Audit Spiral methodologies to measure whether the pre-set target standards for criteria related to the structure and process of care are achieved. Each participating clinic will be invited to complete a Structure of Care Questionnaire evaluating pre-defined indicators which reflect the setting in which care is delivered, while process of care will be evaluated against the pre-defined indicators in the evaluation framework. Effectiveness of the programme will be evaluated in terms of clinical outcomes, service utilization outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes. A cohort study will be conducted on all eligible diabetic patients who have enrolled into RAMP for more than one year to compare their clinical and public service utilization outcomes of RAMP participants and non-participants. Clinical outcome measures will include HbA1c, blood pressure (both systolic and diastolic), lipids (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) and future cardiovascular diseases risk prediction; and public health service utilization rate will include general and specialist outpatient, emergency department attendances, and hospital admissions annually within 5 years. For patient-reported outcomes, a total of 550 participants and another 550 non-participants will be followed by telephone to monitor quality of life, patient enablement, global rating of change in health and private health service utilization at baseline, 6, 12, 36 and 60 months. Discussion: The quality of care and effectiveness of the RAMP in enhancing the health for patients with type 2 diabetes will be determined. Possible areas for quality enhancement will be identified and standards of good practice can be established. The information will be useful in guiding service planning and policy decision making.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Barr Victoria J, 2003, Hosp Q, V7, P73
  • [2] Health reform through coordinated care: SA HealthPlus
    Battersby, MW
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 330 (7492): : 662 - 665
  • [3] Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness - The chronic care model, part 2
    Bodenheimer, T
    Wagner, EH
    Grumbach, K
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (15): : 1909 - 1914
  • [4] A systematic approach to risk stratification and intervention within a managed care environment improves diabetes outcomes and patient satisfaction
    Clark, CM
    Snyder, JW
    Meek, RL
    Stutz, LM
    Parkin, CG
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2001, 24 (06) : 1079 - 1086
  • [5] Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
  • [6] General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care - The Framingham Heart Study
    D'Agostino, Ralph B.
    Vasan, Ramachandran S.
    Pencina, Michael J.
    Wolf, Philip A.
    Cobain, Mark
    Massaro, Joseph M.
    Kannel, William B.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2008, 117 (06) : 743 - 753
  • [7] Validation of the Framingham Coronary Heart Disease prediction scores - Results of a multiple ethnic groups investigation
    D'Agostino, RB
    Grundy, S
    Sullivan, LM
    Wilson, P
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 286 (02): : 180 - 187
  • [8] Domurat ES, 1999, AM J MANAG CARE, V5, P1299
  • [9] EVALUATING QUALITY OF MEDICAL CARE
    DONABEDIAN, A
    [J]. MILBANK MEMORIAL FUND QUARTERLY-HEALTH AND SOCIETY, 1966, 44 (03): : 166 - 206
  • [10] GPOWER: A general power analysis program
    Erdfelder, E
    Faul, F
    Buchner, A
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 1996, 28 (01): : 1 - 11